Outdoor Lighting and Crime - Amper
Outdoor Lighting and Crime - Amper
Outdoor Lighting and Crime - Amper
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
outdoor use of searchlights, skybeams <strong>and</strong> outdoor laser beam displays. The present findings<br />
bolster the case for such a ban.<br />
The use of conventional light beams <strong>and</strong> visible laser beams in the atmosphere for genuine<br />
scientific, engineering <strong>and</strong> navigation purposes does not generally have a ‘people-magnet<br />
effect’. As it is therefore unlikely to represent any significant pro-crime threat it should be<br />
allowed to continue unhindered. Any misuse of such a provision for commercial purposes<br />
would need to be treated harshly.<br />
7.7.6 Control of outdoor lighting<br />
Many precedents already exist for m<strong>and</strong>atory control of outdoor lighting. Numerous<br />
complete texts of national, state, county <strong>and</strong> town lighting laws, ordinances <strong>and</strong> regulations<br />
are readily accessible on the Internet (eg IDA 2002a). The International Dark-Sky<br />
Association’s pattern regulations (IDA 2002b) provide a starting point for local <strong>and</strong> state<br />
authorities considering compilation of their own regulations, although the present work is<br />
likely to raise the need for changes.<br />
An outdoor lighting system should:<br />
• put the available light where it is needed for mobility safety, wayfinding <strong>and</strong> traffic<br />
safety, with minimum spill elsewhere,<br />
• be no brighter than necessary,<br />
• avoid glare <strong>and</strong> light pollution,<br />
• minimise non-uniformity of illumination,<br />
• contribute to keeping fear of crime at acceptably low levels, <strong>and</strong><br />
• minimise adverse known significant environmental, health, safety <strong>and</strong> crime effects.<br />
These requirements effectively redefine what is meant by ‘good lighting’. The specific details<br />
of how such good lighting can be realised in practice are not yet set, but clearly they will tend<br />
to be adaptations of existing practices. Nothing more than minimal interference to good<br />
lighting should be tolerated from illuminated advertising <strong>and</strong> commercial displays, which<br />
themselves must be treated as part of the whole system <strong>and</strong> required to comply fully with the<br />
dot points above.<br />
Immediately applicable results of both parts of his work are that even severe environmental<br />
constraints can be applied to outdoor lighting in the knowledge that the incidence of crime is<br />
most unlikely to become worse as a consequence.<br />
It would make no sense for a city with an ocean port or harbour to have severe constraints on<br />
outdoor lighting if international cruise ships can continue to come <strong>and</strong> go with their typically<br />
excessive external lighting in operation. Ships should be subject to lighting controls while in<br />
national waters, just as they are subject to controls on dumping oil waste <strong>and</strong> water ballast.<br />
7.7.7 Compliance with energy <strong>and</strong> luminous flux limits<br />
Compliance with national <strong>and</strong> regional limits for lighting energy use <strong>and</strong> luminous flux<br />
decrees is likely to be an ongoing issue. In the case of individual properties, energy audits<br />
<strong>and</strong> photometric surveys can provide quantitative data, albeit at a cost that some property<br />
118