11.08.2013 Views

Outdoor Lighting and Crime - Amper

Outdoor Lighting and Crime - Amper

Outdoor Lighting and Crime - Amper

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TABLE 6. Population, <strong>Crime</strong> <strong>and</strong> Upward Light Energy Loss in USA Cities<br />

City<br />

Population,<br />

thous<strong>and</strong>s<br />

UCR Index<br />

<strong>Crime</strong><br />

Number,<br />

thous<strong>and</strong>s<br />

Annual<br />

Upward Light<br />

Energy Loss,<br />

GW.h<br />

Annual<br />

Upward Light<br />

Energy Loss<br />

per Person,<br />

kW.h<br />

Year 1998 1998 1997 1997/1998<br />

New York City NY 7 358 323.2 136 18.5<br />

Minneapolis MN 362.1 34.62 122 (47.7) 337 (132)<br />

St Louis MO 344.2 51.46 93.0 (45.6) 270 (132)<br />

Kansas City MO 447.7 53.73 71.5 (47.0) 160 (105)<br />

Phoenix AZ 1 226 104.7 55.0 44.9<br />

Philadelphia PA 1 449 106.1 48.5 33.5<br />

Washington DC 523.0 46.17 41.8 79.9<br />

Las Vegas NV 908.6 53.12 38.0 41.8<br />

Denver CO 509.3 27.03 29.4 (19.3) 57.7 (38.0)<br />

Baltimore MD 662.3 72.50 29.2 44.1<br />

Portl<strong>and</strong> OR 488.8 46.07 22.2 45.4<br />

Buffalo NY 308.6 22.32 20.0 (13.2) 64.8 (42.6)<br />

Boston MA 559.6 34.98 15.0 26.8<br />

Sacramento CA 384.7 31.62 14.9 38.7<br />

Tucson AZ 467.7 45.30 13.2 28.2<br />

Fresno CA 404.3 32.08 6.66 16.5<br />

Stockton CA 239.7 17.53 3.68 15.4<br />

Modesto CA 183.3 12.35 3.03 16.5<br />

Salem OR 126.4 10.58 2.36 18.7<br />

Eugene OR 127.2 11.46 2.09 16.4<br />

Boulder CO 94.21 4.899 1.27 13.5<br />

The cities in Table 5 are here listed in descending order of their annual total upward<br />

light energy loss observed by satellite (Isobe <strong>and</strong> Hamamura 1998). Estimated<br />

values for no-snow conditions are shown in parentheses. Population <strong>and</strong> number of<br />

UCR Index crimes are from the sources given in Table 5. Population is plotted in<br />

Figure 8 against light energy loss per unit area from Table 5. The no-snow light<br />

energy loss data are plotted in Figures 9 <strong>and</strong> 10.<br />

66<br />

5.2.3.2<br />

Investi<br />

gation<br />

of<br />

appare<br />

nt<br />

outlier<br />

s<br />

Table 6<br />

contain<br />

s<br />

additio<br />

nal<br />

inform<br />

ation<br />

relating<br />

to<br />

crime<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

light<br />

energy<br />

loss for<br />

USA<br />

cities.<br />

The<br />

annual<br />

total<br />

upward<br />

ly<br />

radiate<br />

d light<br />

energy<br />

loss<br />

values<br />

in<br />

Table 6 are analogous to luminous intensity maintained for a given time. To test for possible<br />

anomalies in the DMSP data, these values were plotted in Figure 8 against city population for<br />

each of the 21 cities. Many others have already made plots of light losses against<br />

demographic <strong>and</strong> related variables. NASA (2000) stated that the areal extent of city light<br />

sources is highly correlated with electric power consumption <strong>and</strong> population. The total light<br />

emitted by each city is less well correlated with population (Isobe <strong>and</strong> Hamamura 1998), as is<br />

indicated by the nearly six-hundredfold range of variation shown in the rightmost column of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!