Outdoor Lighting and Crime - Amper
Outdoor Lighting and Crime - Amper
Outdoor Lighting and Crime - Amper
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
TABLE 6. Population, <strong>Crime</strong> <strong>and</strong> Upward Light Energy Loss in USA Cities<br />
City<br />
Population,<br />
thous<strong>and</strong>s<br />
UCR Index<br />
<strong>Crime</strong><br />
Number,<br />
thous<strong>and</strong>s<br />
Annual<br />
Upward Light<br />
Energy Loss,<br />
GW.h<br />
Annual<br />
Upward Light<br />
Energy Loss<br />
per Person,<br />
kW.h<br />
Year 1998 1998 1997 1997/1998<br />
New York City NY 7 358 323.2 136 18.5<br />
Minneapolis MN 362.1 34.62 122 (47.7) 337 (132)<br />
St Louis MO 344.2 51.46 93.0 (45.6) 270 (132)<br />
Kansas City MO 447.7 53.73 71.5 (47.0) 160 (105)<br />
Phoenix AZ 1 226 104.7 55.0 44.9<br />
Philadelphia PA 1 449 106.1 48.5 33.5<br />
Washington DC 523.0 46.17 41.8 79.9<br />
Las Vegas NV 908.6 53.12 38.0 41.8<br />
Denver CO 509.3 27.03 29.4 (19.3) 57.7 (38.0)<br />
Baltimore MD 662.3 72.50 29.2 44.1<br />
Portl<strong>and</strong> OR 488.8 46.07 22.2 45.4<br />
Buffalo NY 308.6 22.32 20.0 (13.2) 64.8 (42.6)<br />
Boston MA 559.6 34.98 15.0 26.8<br />
Sacramento CA 384.7 31.62 14.9 38.7<br />
Tucson AZ 467.7 45.30 13.2 28.2<br />
Fresno CA 404.3 32.08 6.66 16.5<br />
Stockton CA 239.7 17.53 3.68 15.4<br />
Modesto CA 183.3 12.35 3.03 16.5<br />
Salem OR 126.4 10.58 2.36 18.7<br />
Eugene OR 127.2 11.46 2.09 16.4<br />
Boulder CO 94.21 4.899 1.27 13.5<br />
The cities in Table 5 are here listed in descending order of their annual total upward<br />
light energy loss observed by satellite (Isobe <strong>and</strong> Hamamura 1998). Estimated<br />
values for no-snow conditions are shown in parentheses. Population <strong>and</strong> number of<br />
UCR Index crimes are from the sources given in Table 5. Population is plotted in<br />
Figure 8 against light energy loss per unit area from Table 5. The no-snow light<br />
energy loss data are plotted in Figures 9 <strong>and</strong> 10.<br />
66<br />
5.2.3.2<br />
Investi<br />
gation<br />
of<br />
appare<br />
nt<br />
outlier<br />
s<br />
Table 6<br />
contain<br />
s<br />
additio<br />
nal<br />
inform<br />
ation<br />
relating<br />
to<br />
crime<br />
<strong>and</strong><br />
light<br />
energy<br />
loss for<br />
USA<br />
cities.<br />
The<br />
annual<br />
total<br />
upward<br />
ly<br />
radiate<br />
d light<br />
energy<br />
loss<br />
values<br />
in<br />
Table 6 are analogous to luminous intensity maintained for a given time. To test for possible<br />
anomalies in the DMSP data, these values were plotted in Figure 8 against city population for<br />
each of the 21 cities. Many others have already made plots of light losses against<br />
demographic <strong>and</strong> related variables. NASA (2000) stated that the areal extent of city light<br />
sources is highly correlated with electric power consumption <strong>and</strong> population. The total light<br />
emitted by each city is less well correlated with population (Isobe <strong>and</strong> Hamamura 1998), as is<br />
indicated by the nearly six-hundredfold range of variation shown in the rightmost column of