Outdoor Lighting and Crime - Amper
Outdoor Lighting and Crime - Amper
Outdoor Lighting and Crime - Amper
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
TABLE 3. World Cities: Upward Light Energy Losses <strong>and</strong> Population<br />
City, Country<br />
Population,<br />
thous<strong>and</strong>s<br />
(Year)<br />
Annual<br />
Upward Light<br />
Energy Loss<br />
per Unit Area,<br />
MW.h/km 2<br />
Annual<br />
Upward Light<br />
Energy Loss<br />
per Person,<br />
kW.h<br />
Ten highest light energy loss/km 2 :<br />
Trois Rivières, Canada 138 (2001) 205 53.4<br />
Clermont-Ferr<strong>and</strong>, France 1 310 (1999) 87.0 4.45<br />
Ciudad Juarez, Mexico 1 187 (2000) 74.2 13.1<br />
Calgary, Canada 951 (2001) 43.8 87.7<br />
Montreal, Canada 3 426 (2001) 34.4 40.6<br />
Edmonton, Canada 938 (2001) 32.4 62.8<br />
Toronto, Canada 4 683 (2001) 31.6 29.3<br />
Minneapolis MN, USA 368 (1999) 28.2 332<br />
Las Vegas NV, USA 715 (1999) 24.5 53.1<br />
St Louis MO, USA 397 (1999) 22.9 234<br />
Ten lowest light energy loss/km 2 :<br />
Konya, Turkey 743 (1999) 2.11 1.57<br />
Kochi, Japan 331 (2000) 1.96 4.32<br />
Gold Coast, Australia 404 (2001) 1.77 (1996) 4.26<br />
Wellington, New Zeal<strong>and</strong>. 167 (2001) 1.67 (1996) 7.19<br />
Belfast, Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> 279 (1999) 1.52 4.52<br />
Antalya, Turkey 603 (1999) 1.41 1.63<br />
Christchurch, New Zeal<strong>and</strong>. 324 (2001) 1.31 (1996) 5.19<br />
Brasilia, Brazil 1 960 (2000) 1.19 3.27<br />
Phnom Penh, Cambodia 920 (1994) 0.92 0.55<br />
Pyongyang, North Korea 2 360 (1987) 0.11 0.0061<br />
The light energy losses are based on measurements of 153 cities by satellite, in<br />
early 1997 unless otherwise indicated (Isobe <strong>and</strong> Hamamura 1998). Corrections to<br />
no-snow conditions are not made in this table. Populations for the years indicated<br />
are either from national statistical offices, Brinkoff (2002) or van der Heyden<br />
(2002).<br />
A problem with the Isobe <strong>and</strong> Hamamura data now becomes evident in relation to one of the<br />
cities in Table 3. Las Vegas, Nevada, is well known for its numerous intensely bright outdoor<br />
advertising lights, signs <strong>and</strong> laser displays (ILDA 2002). The scattered light dome above the<br />
city is growing rapidly <strong>and</strong> beginning to affect the formerly pristine night sky conditions over<br />
Death Valley National Park (Albers <strong>and</strong> Durisco 2002). “As seen from space, Las Vegas is<br />
the brightest city on earth [sic]” (Schweitzer <strong>and</strong> Schumann 1997). But Table 3 indicates<br />
differently: on a light per unit area basis, Trois Rivières in Canada is 8.4 times brighter than<br />
Las Vegas, which ranks only ninth in the Isobe <strong>and</strong> Hamamura list. Apart from the sensor<br />
60