Space Security Index
Space Security Index
Space Security Index
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Space</strong> <strong>Security</strong> 2011<br />
84<br />
annual budget for 2010 was 67-billion rubles (approximately $2.5-billion), not including<br />
funds for the Global Navigation Satellite System (GLONASS), which had a separate budget<br />
allocation. 60<br />
e ESA budget is approximately $3.6-billion per year. All member states make nancial<br />
contributions to the Agency’s General Budget on a scale based on their GDP. 61<br />
Civil expenditures on space continue to increase considerably in India and China, due in<br />
large part to the growth of civil programs, including large satellites and human spaceight<br />
programs. Since 2005, India’s space budget has dramatically increased and is now<br />
approximately $1-billion. 62 e Chinese space budget is complex. Ocials have been quoted<br />
as saying that the Chinese civil space budget is as low as $500-million, while media sources<br />
place the gure closer to $2-billion. It is safe to speculate that it falls somewhere between<br />
these two gures. 63 However, expenditures are not the sole indicator of capabilities, because<br />
of dierences in production cost among countries, as well as local standards of living and<br />
purchasing power. 64<br />
Human spaceight<br />
On 12 April 1961, Yuri Gagarin became the rst human to travel into space onboard a<br />
Soviet Vostok 1 spacecraft. e early years of human spaceight were dominated by the<br />
USSR, which succeeded in elding the rst woman in space, the rst human spacewalk,<br />
the rst multiple-person space ights, and the longest-duration space ight. Following the<br />
Vostok series rockets, the Soyuz became the workhorse of the Soviet and then Russian<br />
human spaceight program and has since carried out over 100 missions, with a capacity<br />
load of three humans on each ight. e 2006-2015 Federal <strong>Space</strong> Program maintains an<br />
emphasis on human spaceight, featuring ongoing development of a reusable spacecraft to<br />
replace the Soyuz vehicle, and completion of the Russian segment of the ISS. 65<br />
e rst U.S. human mission was completed on 5 May 1961, with the suborbital ight of<br />
the Mercury capsule, launched on an Atlas-Mercury rocket. e Gemini ight series and<br />
then the Apollo ight series followed, ultimately taking humans to the Moon. e U.S.<br />
went on to develop the Skylab human space laboratories in 1973, and the USSR developed<br />
the Mir space station, which operated from 1986 to 2001. In the 1970s, the U.S. initiated<br />
the <strong>Space</strong> Shuttle, which was capable of launching as many as seven people to LEO. e<br />
rst <strong>Space</strong> Shuttle, Columbia, was launched in 1981. By the end of 2008 the program had<br />
completed 124 launches and at the end of 2010 was the only human spaceight capability<br />
for the U.S. 66 For a time after the 2003 <strong>Space</strong> Shuttle Columbia disaster, Russia was the only<br />
actor performing regular human missions and its Soyuz spacecraft provided the only lifeline<br />
to the ISS. is situation may recur following the <strong>Space</strong> Shuttle’s last scheduled ight in<br />
2011 and consideration being given to future reliance on commercial providers of transport<br />
services, though the extent to which they will become a viable alternative is still unclear.<br />
In 2004, the U.S. announced a new NASA plan that includes returning humans to the<br />
Moon by 2020 and a human mission to Mars thereafter. A new strategy for lunar exploration<br />
was announced in 2006. 67 Future plans include a permanent human presence on the lunar<br />
surface. 68 ese plans were examined in 2009 by the Review of United States Human <strong>Space</strong><br />
Flight Plans Committee, whose major nding was that the U.S. human spaceight program<br />
is on an unsustainable trajectory, with the growing scope of the program outstripping the<br />
government’s ability to fund it. In its nal report, the Committee suggests two possible<br />
solutions to the problem of limited resources: