23.01.2014 Views

Industrial Relations in Europe 2012 - European Commission - Europa

Industrial Relations in Europe 2012 - European Commission - Europa

Industrial Relations in Europe 2012 - European Commission - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and not an exact measurement of the public sector. Based on this, <strong>in</strong> this chapter we use the sections<br />

O, P and Q of the Statistical classification of economic activities of the <strong>Europe</strong>an Community<br />

NACE Rev.2, from 2008 onwards 35 . These sections <strong>in</strong>clude respectively: public adm<strong>in</strong>istration and<br />

defence, compulsory social security; education; human health and social work activities 36 . The<br />

share of total employment of employees <strong>in</strong> these activities <strong>in</strong> 2008 and 2011 for the EU-27<br />

countries plus Norway is reported <strong>in</strong> Appendix 3.1, while Table 3.1 below, first column, reports the<br />

share of all public sector activities (O+P+Q) of total employment as an average dur<strong>in</strong>g 2008-2011.<br />

Great variation across countries <strong>in</strong> the relative size of public sector employment is immediately<br />

apparent. Overall, four groups of countries can be identified (Table 3.2). At the two extreme poles,<br />

those with a very large public sector, with an employment share above 29% of total employment,<br />

and those with a much smaller public sector, with an employment share below 20%. The first group<br />

<strong>in</strong>cludes, <strong>in</strong> decreas<strong>in</strong>g order, three out of four of the Nordic countries - Norway, Denmark, Sweden<br />

- <strong>in</strong> connection with the traditional large extension of the welfare state, immediately followed by<br />

Belgium, Luxembourg, France, UK, and the Netherlands. The opposite group comprises five of the<br />

former communist, eastern <strong>Europe</strong>an countries, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Poland, Slovenia, Czech Republic,<br />

Bulgaria, and Romania, plus Cyprus.<br />

35 A similar choice <strong>in</strong> Vaughan-Whitehead <strong>2012</strong>, ch. 1, while <strong>in</strong> Glassman 2010 only section O (Public adm<strong>in</strong>istration<br />

and Defence; Compulsory social security) is considered.<br />

36 In detail:<br />

Section O – PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND DEFENCE; COMPULSORY SOCIAL SECURITY<br />

84.1: Adm<strong>in</strong>istration of the State and the economic and social policy of the community;<br />

84.2: Provision of services to the community as a whole (Foreign affairs; Defence activities; Justice and judicial<br />

activities; Public order and safety activities; Fire service activities);<br />

84.3: Compulsory social security activities;<br />

Section P – EDUCATION<br />

85.1: Pre-primary education<br />

85.2: Primary education<br />

85.3: Secondary education<br />

85.4: Higher education<br />

85.5: Other education<br />

85.6: Educational support activities<br />

Section Q – HUMAN HEALTH AND SOCIAL WORK ACTIVITIES<br />

86.1: Hospital activities<br />

86.2: Medical and dental practice activities<br />

86.9: Other human health activities<br />

87.1: Residential nurs<strong>in</strong>g care activities<br />

87.2: Residential care activities for mental retardation, mental health and substance abuse<br />

87.3: Residential care activities for the elderly and disabled<br />

87.9: Other residential care activities<br />

88.1: Social work activities without accommodation for the elderly and disabled<br />

88.9: Other social work activities without accommodation<br />

120

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!