23.01.2014 Views

Industrial Relations in Europe 2012 - European Commission - Europa

Industrial Relations in Europe 2012 - European Commission - Europa

Industrial Relations in Europe 2012 - European Commission - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A core aim of the CAWIE project has also been the analysis of ‘wage drift’, which is the<br />

difference between the average development of collectively-agreed and actual wages. Wage<br />

drift can be seen as an <strong>in</strong>dicator that identifies additional factors that <strong>in</strong>fluence wage dynamics<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>. Among them are compositional factors, such as upskill<strong>in</strong>g or growth of the service<br />

sector, cyclical factors such as company bonus payments and changes <strong>in</strong> work<strong>in</strong>g time, as<br />

well as <strong>in</strong>dustrial relations factors such as the coverage and level of collective barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and<br />

the possibility of derogat<strong>in</strong>g from national or sectoral standards at company level.<br />

A comparison of the development of collectively-agreed wages and compensation per<br />

employee as measured by national accounts shows that dur<strong>in</strong>g the 2000s <strong>in</strong> most countries<br />

there was a more or less pronounced ‘positive’ wage drift, which means that average <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

of actual wages was above that which was concluded <strong>in</strong> collective agreements. The two<br />

exceptions were Austria and Germany where wage drift was ‘negative’.<br />

Chart 1.8: Nom<strong>in</strong>al collectively agreed wages and nom<strong>in</strong>al compensation per employee,<br />

2010 (2000=100)<br />

Source: TURI-database on Collectively Agreed Wages; AMECO database<br />

In none of the countries considered by the CAWIE project is there any evidence that wage<br />

developments determ<strong>in</strong>ed by collective agreements have been ‘too expensive’ and have<br />

created problems of competitiveness. The remarkably low wage development <strong>in</strong> Germany is<br />

nevertheless significant. It is to a large extent the result of a strong negative wage drift, which<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicates a partial erosion of the German collective barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g system. However, there is a<br />

limit to the extent to which this can serve as a ‘model’ to overcome the economic crisis for all<br />

EU countries, as not all <strong>Europe</strong>an countries can become surplus countries at the same time.<br />

Instead of promot<strong>in</strong>g a “race to the bottom scenario” <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>an wage developments, the<br />

COWIE project concludes that it might be economically more reasonable to strengthen<br />

collective barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>in</strong> order to promote adequate wage <strong>in</strong>creases for a more<br />

balanced and susta<strong>in</strong>able economic development.<br />

Based on a draft by Guy van Gyes (HIVA-KU Leuven) and Thorsten Schulten (WSI<br />

Düsseldorf)<br />

*The CAWIE project is carried out by ten research <strong>in</strong>stitutes and has been funded by the<br />

<strong>Europe</strong>an <strong>Commission</strong> call for proposals on social dialogue and <strong>in</strong>dustrial relations. For more<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation see: http://hiva.kuleuven.be/nl/extra/CAWIE.php<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!