23.01.2014 Views

Industrial Relations in Europe 2012 - European Commission - Europa

Industrial Relations in Europe 2012 - European Commission - Europa

Industrial Relations in Europe 2012 - European Commission - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

purposes of the present analysis. These def<strong>in</strong>itions and classifications are unable to draw a<br />

clear demarcation between private and public sector organisations and employees, and are<br />

therefore too wide and <strong>in</strong>clusive. These drawbacks are especially relevant with regard to<br />

services related to education, health and social work activities, which <strong>in</strong> most countries are<br />

provided not only by public organisations, but to a significant extent also by private sector<br />

for- and non-profit organisations, with personnel on ord<strong>in</strong>ary employment contracts. This<br />

prevents a precise identification of the boundaries of the public sector, and consequently of<br />

the size of public sector employment and its variation over time. Nonetheless, these are the<br />

only data that allow systematic comparisons between countries and sectors. Therefore, it is on<br />

these Eurostat NACE Rev.2 data that our analysis on public sector employment size and<br />

structure is based, unless differently specified. For a discussion of def<strong>in</strong>itions, see box 1.3.<br />

Box 1.3: Statistical classifications for the public sector<br />

The statistical classification of economic activities <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Europe</strong>an Community<br />

(NACE) represents the basic reference for all analysis of the economic structure <strong>in</strong> the<br />

EU. However, NACE is organised along activity rather than ownership l<strong>in</strong>es and<br />

therefore it is not possible to dist<strong>in</strong>guish between the private and the public sector when<br />

look<strong>in</strong>g at the different statistical data which are classified accord<strong>in</strong>g to the NACE<br />

taxonomy, such as employment levels. In the case of NACE Rev.2, the present version<br />

of the classification system, which has been used s<strong>in</strong>ce 2008, the core of the public<br />

sector is to be found <strong>in</strong> section O (Public adm<strong>in</strong>istration, defence; compulsory social<br />

security), s<strong>in</strong>ce most of these activities are performed directly by public employers and<br />

public employees – although not exclusively.<br />

Other important activities for the public sector – which are usually also quite relevant <strong>in</strong><br />

terms of employment – are sections P (Education) and Q (Human Health and Social<br />

Work), s<strong>in</strong>ce the public sector typically directly provides an important share of overall<br />

education and health services. However, private organisations are widely present <strong>in</strong><br />

these activities, with a relative importance which depends on both national traditions as<br />

well as on the national regulatory framework. This framework may <strong>in</strong> some cases<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>guish between the formal responsibility and possibly the fund<strong>in</strong>g of certa<strong>in</strong><br />

services and the legal form as well as the substantive nature of the provider of the<br />

service, so that it is not rare to f<strong>in</strong>d private organisations which operate with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

public education and health systems accord<strong>in</strong>g to ‘accreditation’ rules, for <strong>in</strong>stance. This<br />

latter possibility po<strong>in</strong>ts to a second very important issue when look<strong>in</strong>g at statistical data<br />

on the public sector: their cross-country comparability. Not only should data and<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicators be regarded <strong>in</strong> general as ‘proxies’ of the public sector size, because the<br />

classification is built around activities, but also, <strong>in</strong> the various national sett<strong>in</strong>gs, the<br />

relative importance <strong>in</strong> each NACE section of public and private organisations and<br />

employment is different.<br />

1.3.2 The chang<strong>in</strong>g structure, role and functions of the public sector and of public<br />

services<br />

The public sector is of special relevance for the function<strong>in</strong>g of any economy and society and<br />

for many decades after World War II the public sector was the ma<strong>in</strong> provider of fundamental<br />

and vital economic and societal services such as education, public transport,<br />

telecommunications, healthcare, postal services. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the past decades the public sector has<br />

been faced with major challenges such as budget constra<strong>in</strong>ts and the need to cut public<br />

services, which have led to profound structural reforms of the sector. These reforms are well<br />

documented for the EU (e.g. Ferner, 1995; Schulten, Brandt and Hermann, 2008, Vaughan-<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!