23.01.2014 Views

Industrial Relations in Europe 2012 - European Commission - Europa

Industrial Relations in Europe 2012 - European Commission - Europa

Industrial Relations in Europe 2012 - European Commission - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g trade unions <strong>in</strong> policymak<strong>in</strong>g, Visegrad countries’ governments were more<br />

successful <strong>in</strong> compensat<strong>in</strong>g employees for job loss through generous welfare provisions. All<br />

these <strong>in</strong>itial conditions set the base for structured <strong>in</strong>dustrial relations, which are characterised<br />

by a formally <strong>in</strong>stitutionalised but substantively rather weak system of tripartite <strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />

and social dialogue (Bohle and Greskovits <strong>2012</strong>, Vanhuysse 2006).<br />

The above preconditions shaped the emergence of variation <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrial relations systems<br />

across particular CEECs, but also accounted for some degree of regional coherence with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

liberal, welfarist and corporatist countries. Table 2.8 summarises the ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrial relations<br />

characteristics with<strong>in</strong> each of these country clusters. Countries located <strong>in</strong> the same cluster<br />

share broad labour market characteristics and welfare state provisions. However, <strong>in</strong>dicators of<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustrial relations structure (organisation of trade unions and employers’ associations,<br />

barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g levels, extension mechanisms and the role of tripartite councils) and outcomes<br />

(barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g coverage, union and employer density) document that there is variation also<br />

between countries located <strong>in</strong> the same cluster. For example, with<strong>in</strong> the liberal country cluster,<br />

there are systematic differences between the Baltic States on the one hand and Romania and<br />

Bulgaria on the other hand. These differences can be ascribed to the long-term <strong>in</strong>terplay of<br />

labour mobilisation and barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stitutionalisation as presented <strong>in</strong> Table 2.7 above.<br />

Table 2.8 Labour markets, welfare states and ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrial relations characteristics <strong>in</strong><br />

the CEECs after EU accession (2004-2008)<br />

Liberal Baltics<br />

and Balkan<br />

countries<br />

( EE, LV, LT)<br />

Balkan<br />

countries<br />

(BG, RO)<br />

Welfarist<br />

Visegrad<br />

countries (CZ,<br />

HU, PL, SK)<br />

Corporatist<br />

Slovenia (SI)<br />

Labour<br />

markets<br />

Flexible, high<br />

work-related<br />

migration from<br />

these countries<br />

abroad<br />

Flexible, high<br />

work-related<br />

migration from<br />

these countries<br />

abroad<br />

Regulated<br />

flexibility, workrelated<br />

migration<br />

high from Poland<br />

and Slovakia,<br />

lower from<br />

Hungary,<br />

marg<strong>in</strong>al from<br />

the Czech<br />

Republic<br />

Welfare state M<strong>in</strong>imalist M<strong>in</strong>imalist Generous but<br />

strict conditions,<br />

target<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

population<br />

outside of<br />

employment<br />

(mostly<br />

pensioners);<br />

Lack of active<br />

labour market<br />

policies<br />

Regulated, low<br />

migration abroad<br />

for work<br />

purposes<br />

Generous<br />

85

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!