23.01.2014 Views

Industrial Relations in Europe 2012 - European Commission - Europa

Industrial Relations in Europe 2012 - European Commission - Europa

Industrial Relations in Europe 2012 - European Commission - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chart 1.5: Organisation rate of employers’ organisations, 2002 and 2008<br />

Source: J. Visser, ICTWSS database 3.0, 2011.<br />

Some 2008 data was revised. Newer data for 2009 on employer density and show<strong>in</strong>g significant<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> relation to 2008 is available only for Slovenia, where density decreased from 70% to<br />

55%. For the other countries, data is either unavailable or show no differences (AT, BE, CZ) or<br />

marg<strong>in</strong>al differences (EE, SE) and was therefore not used.<br />

Decentralisation and organisation of collective barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

Decentralisation of the level of collective barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g has been one of the ma<strong>in</strong> trends <strong>in</strong><br />

collective barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g over the last 20-30 years, as the focus for negotiations on wages and<br />

work<strong>in</strong>g conditions has moved away from the national and sectoral level to the company<br />

level. As noted <strong>in</strong> IRE 2010, this tends to lead to more multi-level barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the place of<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle-level barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, and has implications for the collective organisations outside the firm,<br />

namely, trade unions and employers' organisations.<br />

The most recent data <strong>in</strong>dicates that the trend to decentralise collective barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />

and accelerated dur<strong>in</strong>g the economic crisis both among the EU-15 and EU-12 countries.<br />

Barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g centralisation was lower <strong>in</strong> 2010 compared with the average for 2007-2009 <strong>in</strong> ten<br />

Member States. The most significant changes occurred <strong>in</strong> Ireland and Slovenia, where<br />

centralisation dropped substantially. In four other countries, Belgium, Germany, Sweden and<br />

Denmark, the centralisation of collective barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creased slightly dur<strong>in</strong>g the same period.<br />

Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, the centralisation <strong>in</strong>dex for these countries was above the EU average even<br />

before these recent <strong>in</strong>creases. Barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g centralisation <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Europe</strong>an Union rema<strong>in</strong>s very<br />

diverse with eight member states <strong>in</strong> which barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g at local and company levels completely<br />

predom<strong>in</strong>ates - the UK, Ireland and six new Member States. In the majority of countries,<br />

however, barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g still takes place primarily at the sectoral or <strong>in</strong>dustry level, often with<br />

additional local or company barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. In 2010 Belgium was the only Member State where<br />

cross-sectoral barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g prevails.<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!