11.03.2014 Views

beyond pt 0 23/1

beyond pt 0 23/1

beyond pt 0 23/1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Box 2.2<br />

Frictionless commerce?<br />

There have been many claims that the Internet represents a new ’frictionless market’.<br />

These claims have until now been largely based in theory, with little or no empirical<br />

evidence to substantiate the claims.<br />

However, research released in August 1999 by Erik Brynjolfsson and Michael Smith at<br />

the MIT Sloan School of Management has produced evidence suggesting that prices<br />

for goods sold via the Internet are lower than at conventional outlets.<br />

The MIT study compiled a data set of over 8 500 price observations collected over a<br />

period of 15 months, comparing pricing behaviour at 41 Internet and conventional<br />

retail outlets. It found that prices for books and CDs sold on the Internet average<br />

9–16 per cent less than identical items sold through conventional channels.<br />

The conclusions of the MIT study have had a major bearing on the modelling<br />

exercise conducted in this pilot study. While all Industry Reference Group members<br />

agreed that the reduced friction of Internet commerce would indeed reduce prices,<br />

identifying the extent to which it would reduce prices proved problematic.<br />

The results of the MIT study were therefore used as a benchmark against the<br />

observations of the Industry Reference Group to ensure that the direct impacts<br />

introduced to the model were in line with the most up-to-date analysis in this area.<br />

Source:<br />

The Allen Consulting Group.<br />

Evaluation of the economic implications of greater use of e-commerce<br />

requires understanding about developments within and between<br />

industries. A review of key industry impacts is conducted in<br />

following cha<strong>pt</strong>ers.<br />

When discussing productivity and commerce with less friction, the<br />

tendency is to focus upon business efficiencies. Closer inspection reveals<br />

that there is another party—the consumer—in every transaction that is<br />

also concerned about ease, convenience and efficiency. Reducing<br />

consumers’ transaction costs leads to efficiencies that free up resources<br />

(i.e. time) that can be used elsewhere.<br />

2.2 Changes in competitiveness<br />

With the Internet, businesses have greater scope to advertise and sell their<br />

products into a global market at lower cost. This is an opportunity that<br />

even small and medium sized businesses are taking advantage of already.<br />

Of course, Australia also becomes a market that is more accessible to<br />

foreign businesses.<br />

2.3 New products and ways of doing things<br />

It is likely that the impact of e-commerce will be magnified many times<br />

over when changes in capacity are reflected in completely new products<br />

and services. The impact of new products is particularly difficult to assess.<br />

It is possible that the future development of innovations based around<br />

greater use of e-commerce will follow the ‘reverse product cycle’ of<br />

innovation in services. In the initial phase, incremental process<br />

innovations increase efficiency. In the second phase, more radical<br />

innovations lead to substantial improvements in quality. In the third,<br />

product rather than process innovations become important. It takes until<br />

this third stage for new industries and products to become dominant.<br />

While all three phases may become operational in the time frame under<br />

analysis in this study, the most significant new products are to be expected<br />

only in the more distant future. The main focus of the quantitative<br />

modelling to be introduced later will be upon the efficiency gains<br />

characteristic of the first phase.<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!