11.03.2014 Views

beyond pt 0 23/1

beyond pt 0 23/1

beyond pt 0 23/1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cha<strong>pt</strong>er Six<br />

Policy implications and next steps<br />

What are the key points that can be drawn from this pilot study? This<br />

Cha<strong>pt</strong>er outlines some observations about the magnitude of the change<br />

envisaged, implications for policy and further analysis of this<br />

important issue.<br />

Additional output in the order of 2.7 per cent of GDP as a consequence<br />

of greater use of e-commerce should not come as a large surprise. The<br />

fact that market participants are embracing the new technology at a pace<br />

that is astonishing indicates that there is already widespread agreement<br />

that the opportunities are extensive.<br />

It is important to place the magnitude of the forecast impact into context.<br />

The result should be viewed as the net gains from the transformation to a<br />

more efficient business mode. It may seem a small number relative to<br />

most other values that are bandied about regarding e-commerce, but then<br />

most efficiency gains are about seemingly small changes at the margin. It<br />

is hard to find assessments of changes in the way that business is done<br />

which have simulated growth dividends as big as that found for<br />

e-commerce. The only example that comes to mind in the consulting team<br />

is the Industry Commission’s simulation of the Hilmer reforms. By<br />

ado<strong>pt</strong>ing a very broad view of the savings which could be attributed to<br />

the successful implementation of Hilmer, the Commission found a<br />

consum<strong>pt</strong>ion gain of about three per cent compared to the 3.2 per cent<br />

increase in consum<strong>pt</strong>ion due to e-commerce as modelled in this study. 20<br />

Other microeconomic reforms such as tariff cuts generate relatively<br />

negligible gains. For example, in their final report on the Motor Vehicle<br />

Inquiry of 1997, the Commission showed a sustainable consum<strong>pt</strong>ion gain<br />

from the proposed reduction in tariffs of 0.3 per cent. 21<br />

It is important to note that the MONASH model generally assumes the<br />

efficient functioning of markets in the long run. Obtaining the estimated<br />

net benefits depends, therefore, in part upon continued success in the<br />

government’s pursuit of other crucial microeconomic reforms. This would<br />

ensure that businesses pass on cost savings that stem from e-commerce<br />

and that the market is able to adjust smoothly to the substantial transition<br />

that is to come. This in turn requires ongoing commitment to maintaining<br />

competitive product markets, increasing the flexibility of labour markets<br />

and continuing to enhance the efficiency of capital markets.<br />

High expectations notwithstanding, the outlook for greater use of<br />

e-commerce should not be taken for granted. The technology is still at an<br />

early stage. While it appears to be entrenched for business purposes, the<br />

popular appeal may fade. Retailers may find that e-commerce is merely<br />

another marketing channel. Policy decisions taken by government may<br />

make or break the appropriate environment for the use of e-commerce<br />

to expand.<br />

This finding reinforces the current thrust of the Commonwealth<br />

Government’s approach to policy. The benefits are of such an order of<br />

magnitude that the government should continue to seek to ensure rapid<br />

ado<strong>pt</strong>ion of e-commerce. It should continue its thrust of seeking to<br />

remove or alleviate the impact of market impediments.<br />

20 Industry Commission.<br />

21 Productivity Commission, The Automotive Industry, Volume II: Appendices, Report No. 58,<br />

26 May1997.<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!