11.03.2014 Views

Segmentation of Stochastic Images using ... - Jacobs University

Segmentation of Stochastic Images using ... - Jacobs University

Segmentation of Stochastic Images using ... - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7.5 <strong>Segmentation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Stochastic</strong> <strong>Images</strong> Using <strong>Stochastic</strong> Level Sets<br />

Figure 7.10: Mean (left) <strong>of</strong> the stochastic CT and the variance (right) <strong>of</strong> the stochastic Chan-Vese<br />

solution. Additionally, we show the expected value contour at different time steps.<br />

The regularized stochastic δ-function δ ε is<br />

1<br />

δ ε (z(ω)) =<br />

πε + π . (7.38)<br />

ε<br />

z(ω)2<br />

The mean value <strong>of</strong> the object and the background is a stochastic quantity because we have to average<br />

over a collection <strong>of</strong> random variables. The mean values are<br />

∫<br />

D<br />

c 1 (φ) =<br />

u ∫<br />

0(x)H ε (φ(x))dx<br />

∫<br />

D<br />

D H and c 2 (φ) =<br />

u 0(x)(1 − H ε (φ(x)))dx<br />

∫<br />

ε(φ(x))dx<br />

D (1 − H . (7.39)<br />

ε(φ(x)))dx<br />

Note that we average over the spatial dimensions, i.e. over the deterministic image domain only.<br />

Thus, c 1 and c 2 are random variables. In (7.39) we have to evaluate the Heaviside approximation,<br />

which involves the computation <strong>of</strong> the inverse tangent <strong>of</strong> a stochastic quantity. To avoid the necessity<br />

to develop a numerical scheme for the stochastic inverse tangent, we use a well-known approximation,<br />

see e.g. [131]:<br />

{<br />

x<br />

arctan(x) ≈<br />

1+0.28x 2 if |x| ≤ 1<br />

else<br />

π<br />

2 − x<br />

x 2 +0.28<br />

. (7.40)<br />

This is not a real drawback <strong>of</strong> the stochastic discretization, because it can be interpreted as an alternative<br />

approximation <strong>of</strong> the Heaviside function and is not as bad as an approximation <strong>of</strong> an approximation<br />

as it might look. The remaining part <strong>of</strong> the Chan-Vese model is generalized to stochastic<br />

quantities by <strong>using</strong> Debusschere’s methods for the computation with polynomial chaos quantities<br />

(see Section 3.3 and [38]). The main driving force <strong>of</strong> the stochastic Chan-Vese model is the difference<br />

between the mean value <strong>of</strong> the separated region and the actual gray value. The mean value<br />

<strong>of</strong> the image regions is computed via an averaging <strong>of</strong> a collection <strong>of</strong> random variables. Thus, the<br />

stochastic information cancels out <strong>of</strong> the stochastic Chan-Vese model, because we are approximating<br />

the “real”, noise-free, mean value when we average over a huge number <strong>of</strong> random variables.<br />

The Variance as Homogenization Criterion for <strong>Stochastic</strong> Chan-Vese <strong>Segmentation</strong><br />

Up to now, we have used the (spatial) mean value <strong>of</strong> the stochastic image as homogenization criterion<br />

only. Thus, we ignore stochastic information, e.g. the variance, <strong>of</strong> the stochastic image. Homogenizing<br />

the variance <strong>of</strong> the segmented object and background can improve the segmentation result<br />

further. For example, in medical images different organs or tissue components can have different<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!