11.03.2014 Views

Segmentation of Stochastic Images using ... - Jacobs University

Segmentation of Stochastic Images using ... - Jacobs University

Segmentation of Stochastic Images using ... - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.2 Ambrosio-Tortorelli <strong>Segmentation</strong> on <strong>Stochastic</strong> <strong>Images</strong><br />

✛<br />

✛<br />

j<br />

✻<br />

i<br />

❄<br />

✲<br />

α<br />

✲<br />

✻ + L α,β<br />

✟ ✟✟✟✟✟Mα,β β<br />

❄<br />

Figure 6.9: Structure <strong>of</strong> the block system <strong>of</strong> an SPDE. Every block has the sparsity structure <strong>of</strong> a<br />

classical finite element matrix and the block structure <strong>of</strong> the matrix is sparse, meaning<br />

that some <strong>of</strong> the blocks are zero. The sparsity structure on the block level depends on the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> random variables and the polynomial chaos degree used in the discretization.<br />

6.2.2 Weak Formulation and Discretization<br />

The system (6.16) contains two elliptic SPDEs, which are supposed to be interpreted in the weak<br />

sense. To this end, we multiply the equations by a test function θ : H 1 (D) × L 2 (Γ) → IR, integrate<br />

over Γ with respect to the corresponding probability measure, and integrate by parts over the physical<br />

domain D. For the first equation in (6.16) this leads us to<br />

∫<br />

Γ<br />

∫<br />

D<br />

)<br />

∫<br />

µ<br />

(φ (x,ξ ) 2 + k ε ∇u(x,ξ ) · ∇θ(x,ξ ) + u(x,ξ )θ(x,ξ )dxdΠ =<br />

Γ<br />

∫<br />

D<br />

u 0 (x,ξ )θ(x,ξ )dxdΠ<br />

(6.23)<br />

and to an analog expression for the second part <strong>of</strong> (6.16). Here we assume homogeneous Neumann<br />

boundary conditions for u and φ such that no boundary terms appear in the weak form. For the existence<br />

<strong>of</strong> solutions <strong>of</strong> this SPDE, the constant k ε is supposed to ensure the positivity <strong>of</strong> the diffusion<br />

coefficient µ(φ 2 + k ε ). In fact, there must exist c min ,c max ∈ (0,∞) and I = [c min ,c max ] such that<br />

(<br />

P ω ∈ Ω ∣ )<br />

µ<br />

(φ (x,ξ (ω)) 2 + k ε ∈ I<br />

)<br />

∀x ∈ D = 1 , (6.24)<br />

i.e. the coefficient is bounded almost sure by c min and c max .<br />

The Doob-Dynkin lemma (see Section 3.2.3) ensures that the solutions <strong>of</strong> the SPDEs have a representation<br />

in the same basis as the input, allowing us to use the same polynomial chaos approximation<br />

for the input and the solution <strong>of</strong> the SPDEs. This is due to the continuity and measurability <strong>of</strong> the<br />

stochastic partial differential operators.<br />

The weak system (6.23) is discretized by a substitution <strong>of</strong> the polynomial chaos expansion (5.3) <strong>of</strong><br />

the image and the phase field. As test functions, products P j (x)Ψ β (ξ ) <strong>of</strong> spatial basis functions and<br />

stochastic basis functions are used. Denoting the vectors <strong>of</strong> coefficients by U α = (u i α) i∈I ∈ IR |I |<br />

and similarly for the phase field φ and the initial image u 0 we get the fully discrete systems<br />

N (<br />

∑<br />

) M α,β + L α,β U α =<br />

α=1<br />

(<br />

N<br />

∑<br />

α=1<br />

εS α,β + T α,β ) Φ α =<br />

N<br />

∑<br />

α=1<br />

N<br />

∑<br />

α=1<br />

M α,β (U 0 ) α<br />

A α (6.25)<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!