Segmentation of Stochastic Images using ... - Jacobs University
Segmentation of Stochastic Images using ... - Jacobs University
Segmentation of Stochastic Images using ... - Jacobs University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
6.2 Ambrosio-Tortorelli <strong>Segmentation</strong> on <strong>Stochastic</strong> <strong>Images</strong><br />
✛<br />
✛<br />
j<br />
✻<br />
i<br />
❄<br />
✲<br />
α<br />
✲<br />
✻ + L α,β<br />
✟ ✟✟✟✟✟Mα,β β<br />
❄<br />
Figure 6.9: Structure <strong>of</strong> the block system <strong>of</strong> an SPDE. Every block has the sparsity structure <strong>of</strong> a<br />
classical finite element matrix and the block structure <strong>of</strong> the matrix is sparse, meaning<br />
that some <strong>of</strong> the blocks are zero. The sparsity structure on the block level depends on the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> random variables and the polynomial chaos degree used in the discretization.<br />
6.2.2 Weak Formulation and Discretization<br />
The system (6.16) contains two elliptic SPDEs, which are supposed to be interpreted in the weak<br />
sense. To this end, we multiply the equations by a test function θ : H 1 (D) × L 2 (Γ) → IR, integrate<br />
over Γ with respect to the corresponding probability measure, and integrate by parts over the physical<br />
domain D. For the first equation in (6.16) this leads us to<br />
∫<br />
Γ<br />
∫<br />
D<br />
)<br />
∫<br />
µ<br />
(φ (x,ξ ) 2 + k ε ∇u(x,ξ ) · ∇θ(x,ξ ) + u(x,ξ )θ(x,ξ )dxdΠ =<br />
Γ<br />
∫<br />
D<br />
u 0 (x,ξ )θ(x,ξ )dxdΠ<br />
(6.23)<br />
and to an analog expression for the second part <strong>of</strong> (6.16). Here we assume homogeneous Neumann<br />
boundary conditions for u and φ such that no boundary terms appear in the weak form. For the existence<br />
<strong>of</strong> solutions <strong>of</strong> this SPDE, the constant k ε is supposed to ensure the positivity <strong>of</strong> the diffusion<br />
coefficient µ(φ 2 + k ε ). In fact, there must exist c min ,c max ∈ (0,∞) and I = [c min ,c max ] such that<br />
(<br />
P ω ∈ Ω ∣ )<br />
µ<br />
(φ (x,ξ (ω)) 2 + k ε ∈ I<br />
)<br />
∀x ∈ D = 1 , (6.24)<br />
i.e. the coefficient is bounded almost sure by c min and c max .<br />
The Doob-Dynkin lemma (see Section 3.2.3) ensures that the solutions <strong>of</strong> the SPDEs have a representation<br />
in the same basis as the input, allowing us to use the same polynomial chaos approximation<br />
for the input and the solution <strong>of</strong> the SPDEs. This is due to the continuity and measurability <strong>of</strong> the<br />
stochastic partial differential operators.<br />
The weak system (6.23) is discretized by a substitution <strong>of</strong> the polynomial chaos expansion (5.3) <strong>of</strong><br />
the image and the phase field. As test functions, products P j (x)Ψ β (ξ ) <strong>of</strong> spatial basis functions and<br />
stochastic basis functions are used. Denoting the vectors <strong>of</strong> coefficients by U α = (u i α) i∈I ∈ IR |I |<br />
and similarly for the phase field φ and the initial image u 0 we get the fully discrete systems<br />
N (<br />
∑<br />
) M α,β + L α,β U α =<br />
α=1<br />
(<br />
N<br />
∑<br />
α=1<br />
εS α,β + T α,β ) Φ α =<br />
N<br />
∑<br />
α=1<br />
N<br />
∑<br />
α=1<br />
M α,β (U 0 ) α<br />
A α (6.25)<br />
69