Segmentation of Stochastic Images using ... - Jacobs University
Segmentation of Stochastic Images using ... - Jacobs University
Segmentation of Stochastic Images using ... - Jacobs University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4.3 <strong>Stochastic</strong> Finite Elements<br />
methods. In the following, we present an approach, where we discretize the SPDE directly. To make<br />
the approach more illustrative we demonstrate the method by <strong>using</strong> a parabolic SPDE<br />
∂ t u(t,x,ω) − u xx (t,x,ω) = f (t,x,ω) . (4.5)<br />
The temporal and spatial derivatives are determined <strong>using</strong> well-known approximations. Using the<br />
explicit Euler scheme for the discretization <strong>of</strong> the time derivative, we get<br />
u(t + τ,x,ω) = u(t,x,ω) + τ(u xx (t,x,ω) + f (t,x,ω)) . (4.6)<br />
Discretizing the spatial derivative <strong>using</strong> central differences, the fully discrete equation is<br />
( )<br />
u(t,x + h,ω) − 2u(t,x,ω) + u(t,x − h,ω)<br />
u(t + τ,x,ω) = u(t,x,ω) + τ<br />
+ f (t,x,ω)<br />
h 2<br />
. (4.7)<br />
The stochastic quantities in this equation are approximated by <strong>using</strong> a truncated polynomial chaos<br />
expansion leading to a numerical scheme that needs methods for the addition and multiplication <strong>of</strong><br />
polynomial chaos expansions. Section 3.3 presents numerical methods for this task.<br />
The main drawback <strong>of</strong> these methods is that computations in the polynomial chaos require the<br />
solution <strong>of</strong> linear systems <strong>of</strong> equations. Furthermore, the construction <strong>of</strong> unstructured or adaptive<br />
grids is complicated in comparison to the generation <strong>of</strong> adaptive grids for finite elements.<br />
The advantage <strong>of</strong> stochastic finite difference methods is the simple possibility to parallelize explicit<br />
stochastic finite difference schemes, because the computations on different nodes are independent.<br />
4.3 <strong>Stochastic</strong> Finite Elements<br />
It is well-known that the variational formulation <strong>of</strong> a deterministic PDE is<br />
find u ∈ V such that a(u,v) = b(v) ∀v ∈ V , (4.8)<br />
where a(·,·) is a bilinear form related to the PDE and b(·) a linear form related to the right hand side<br />
<strong>of</strong> the PDE. The space V is the space <strong>of</strong> all admissible functions, e.g. the Sobolev space H0 1 for the<br />
simple prototype equation −∇ · (k∇φ) = f in D, φ = 0 on ∂D.<br />
For stochastic coefficients, right hand sides or boundary conditions, the bilinear and/or linear<br />
form become stochastic quantities. Denote by a(u,v,ω), b(v,ω) the dependence <strong>of</strong> the forms on the<br />
stochastic event ω ∈ Ω. The aim <strong>of</strong> the stochastic problem is to find a random field, i.e. an element <strong>of</strong><br />
the tensor product space V ⊗S , u ∈ V ⊗S , where S is the space <strong>of</strong> random functions, e.g. L 2 (Ω),<br />
the space <strong>of</strong> all random variables with finite second order moments. The weak formulation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
stochastic problem is:<br />
find u ∈ V ⊗ S such that A(u,v) = B(v) ∀v ∈ V ⊗ S , (4.9)<br />
where<br />
∫<br />
A(u,v) = a(u,v,ω)dω = E(a(u,v,ω)) (4.10)<br />
Ω<br />
and<br />
∫<br />
B(v) = b(v,ω)dω = E(b(v,ω)) . (4.11)<br />
Ω<br />
The weak formulation <strong>of</strong> an SPDE is simply the expectation <strong>of</strong> the deterministic problem (4.8).. To<br />
ensure existence and uniqueness <strong>of</strong> a solution, we need the form A to be continuous and coercive and<br />
the form B to be continuous on the space V ⊗S . Hence, coercivity and continuity are ensured if the<br />
forms a and b are coercive, respectively continuous, for elementary events ω ∈ Ω almost sure and<br />
such that the Wick product is well-defined (cf. Section 3.2.1).<br />
39