Segmentation of Stochastic Images using ... - Jacobs University
Segmentation of Stochastic Images using ... - Jacobs University
Segmentation of Stochastic Images using ... - Jacobs University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
6.1 Random Walker <strong>Segmentation</strong> on <strong>Stochastic</strong> <strong>Images</strong><br />
Figure 6.4: PDF <strong>of</strong> the area <strong>of</strong> the segmented person from the street image for β = 25 (black) and<br />
β = 50 (gray). From the PDF we judge the reliability <strong>of</strong> the segmentation, a narrow PDF<br />
indicates that the image noise influences the segmentation marginally.<br />
Remark 12. Another possibility to calculate the object volume is to count pixels with a value above<br />
0.5 only. Thus, we compute image samples from the stochastic result via a Monte Carlo approach,<br />
threshold these samples, count the number <strong>of</strong> object pixels, and calculate the volume PDF. This<br />
method is time-consuming. The proposed method has the advantage to include the partial volume<br />
effect [21] at the boundary, because it considers pixels with a probability less than 0.5 partially.<br />
6.1.3 Comparison with Monte Carlo Simulation and <strong>Stochastic</strong> Collocation<br />
To verify the intrusive solution <strong>of</strong> the resulting SPDE via polynomial chaos, stochastic finite elements,<br />
and the GSD method, we compared this solution with the solutions obtained via Monte Carlo<br />
sampling and a stochastic collocation approach. Fig. 6.5 shows the comparison <strong>of</strong> the expected value<br />
and the variance computed via GSD, stochastic collocation, and Monte Carlo sampling. The small<br />
difference between the variances <strong>of</strong> the three solutions might be due to the projection <strong>of</strong> the Laplacian<br />
matrix on the polynomial chaos. However, the great benefit <strong>of</strong> the GSD method is the significantly<br />
better performance. We now investigate this in detail.<br />
6.1.4 Performance Evaluation<br />
Due to the availability <strong>of</strong> the implementation possibilities for the solution <strong>of</strong> SPDEs, we are able<br />
to compare the execution times <strong>of</strong> the approaches. We did the detailed comparison for the random<br />
walker segmentation in this thesis only, but the results generalize to the Ambrosio-Tortorelli<br />
approach, because it uses the same methods.<br />
Table 6.1 shows the comparison <strong>of</strong> the execution times <strong>of</strong> the GSD method, the Monte Carlo<br />
method, and the stochastic collocation method with Smolyak and full grid. It is easy to see that<br />
the GSD method outperforms the sampled based approaches. This supports the decision to prefer<br />
the GSD method and the finite difference method for random variables throughout this thesis. The<br />
stochastic collocation methods suffer from the “curse <strong>of</strong> dimension” [119], because the execution<br />
times grow exponentially with the number <strong>of</strong> random variables in the stochastic images.<br />
63