11.03.2014 Views

Segmentation of Stochastic Images using ... - Jacobs University

Segmentation of Stochastic Images using ... - Jacobs University

Segmentation of Stochastic Images using ... - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.1 Random Walker <strong>Segmentation</strong> on <strong>Stochastic</strong> <strong>Images</strong><br />

Figure 6.4: PDF <strong>of</strong> the area <strong>of</strong> the segmented person from the street image for β = 25 (black) and<br />

β = 50 (gray). From the PDF we judge the reliability <strong>of</strong> the segmentation, a narrow PDF<br />

indicates that the image noise influences the segmentation marginally.<br />

Remark 12. Another possibility to calculate the object volume is to count pixels with a value above<br />

0.5 only. Thus, we compute image samples from the stochastic result via a Monte Carlo approach,<br />

threshold these samples, count the number <strong>of</strong> object pixels, and calculate the volume PDF. This<br />

method is time-consuming. The proposed method has the advantage to include the partial volume<br />

effect [21] at the boundary, because it considers pixels with a probability less than 0.5 partially.<br />

6.1.3 Comparison with Monte Carlo Simulation and <strong>Stochastic</strong> Collocation<br />

To verify the intrusive solution <strong>of</strong> the resulting SPDE via polynomial chaos, stochastic finite elements,<br />

and the GSD method, we compared this solution with the solutions obtained via Monte Carlo<br />

sampling and a stochastic collocation approach. Fig. 6.5 shows the comparison <strong>of</strong> the expected value<br />

and the variance computed via GSD, stochastic collocation, and Monte Carlo sampling. The small<br />

difference between the variances <strong>of</strong> the three solutions might be due to the projection <strong>of</strong> the Laplacian<br />

matrix on the polynomial chaos. However, the great benefit <strong>of</strong> the GSD method is the significantly<br />

better performance. We now investigate this in detail.<br />

6.1.4 Performance Evaluation<br />

Due to the availability <strong>of</strong> the implementation possibilities for the solution <strong>of</strong> SPDEs, we are able<br />

to compare the execution times <strong>of</strong> the approaches. We did the detailed comparison for the random<br />

walker segmentation in this thesis only, but the results generalize to the Ambrosio-Tortorelli<br />

approach, because it uses the same methods.<br />

Table 6.1 shows the comparison <strong>of</strong> the execution times <strong>of</strong> the GSD method, the Monte Carlo<br />

method, and the stochastic collocation method with Smolyak and full grid. It is easy to see that<br />

the GSD method outperforms the sampled based approaches. This supports the decision to prefer<br />

the GSD method and the finite difference method for random variables throughout this thesis. The<br />

stochastic collocation methods suffer from the “curse <strong>of</strong> dimension” [119], because the execution<br />

times grow exponentially with the number <strong>of</strong> random variables in the stochastic images.<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!