11.03.2014 Views

Segmentation of Stochastic Images using ... - Jacobs University

Segmentation of Stochastic Images using ... - Jacobs University

Segmentation of Stochastic Images using ... - Jacobs University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 6 <strong>Segmentation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Stochastic</strong> <strong>Images</strong> Using Elliptic SPDEs<br />

Figure 6.3: MC-realizations <strong>of</strong> the stochastic object boundary for the stochastic liver image segmented<br />

with the stochastic random walker approach with β = 10. On the right we highlight<br />

a region <strong>of</strong> the image, where the noise in the input image influences the result.<br />

Remark 11. The classical random walker result can be interpreted as a probability map, i.e. the<br />

result <strong>of</strong> random walker segmentation is a probability for every pixel to belong to the object or not.<br />

When we apply the stochastic random walker method, the first interpretation <strong>of</strong> the result is that we<br />

compute “probabilities <strong>of</strong> probabilities”, because we are computing the probability distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

the values at every pixel. Let us emphasize that the probability interpretation <strong>of</strong> the classical result is<br />

one possible interpretation only. Mathematically, we are computing the result <strong>of</strong> a diffusion problem,<br />

and the stochastic extension is, in this interpretation, a diffusion problem with stochastic diffusion<br />

coefficient. The results can be interpreted as the stochastic solution <strong>of</strong> the stochastic diffusion problem.<br />

The analog to the probability interpretation is that we computed the probabilities for belonging<br />

to the object in dependence on the input gray value uncertainty.<br />

The stochastic object boundary can be visualized by tracking the deterministic object boundary (the<br />

value 0.5 in the result image) for realizations <strong>of</strong> the random variables. The work <strong>of</strong> Prassni et al. [126]<br />

inspired this kind <strong>of</strong> visualization. The difference is that Prassni et al. [126] visualized the iso-lines<br />

<strong>of</strong> different probabilities, whereas we visualize the same iso-line for realizations <strong>of</strong> the stochastic<br />

image. Fig. 6.3 shows the result <strong>of</strong> such a visualization.<br />

It is possible to compute and visualize other quantities extracted from the segmentation, e.g. the<br />

volume <strong>of</strong> the segmented object. The obvious visualization <strong>of</strong> the stochastic volume is to draw the<br />

PDF <strong>of</strong> the volume. The PDF <strong>of</strong> the segmented volume can be computed from the segmentation by<br />

summing up the random variables at every pixel, because they specify the “probability” that the pixel<br />

belongs to the object. Thus, the random variable v(ξ ) specifying the objects volume is<br />

v(ξ ) =<br />

N<br />

∑<br />

α=1<br />

v α Ψ α (ξ ) := ∑ x i (ξ ) . (6.12)<br />

i∈I<br />

Having a look at the PDF, it is easy to decide whether the image noise influences the segmented<br />

volume strongly or not. If the segmented volume is strongly influenced the PDF is broad, otherwise<br />

the function is narrow. Fig. 6.4 shows the PDF <strong>of</strong> the segmented volume from the street image.<br />

Moreover, the choice <strong>of</strong> the parameter β influences the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the PDF. A smaller β leads to a<br />

diffuse object boundary and to a broader PDF.<br />

62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!