Segmentation of Stochastic Images using ... - Jacobs University
Segmentation of Stochastic Images using ... - Jacobs University
Segmentation of Stochastic Images using ... - Jacobs University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 6 <strong>Segmentation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Stochastic</strong> <strong>Images</strong> Using Elliptic SPDEs<br />
Figure 6.3: MC-realizations <strong>of</strong> the stochastic object boundary for the stochastic liver image segmented<br />
with the stochastic random walker approach with β = 10. On the right we highlight<br />
a region <strong>of</strong> the image, where the noise in the input image influences the result.<br />
Remark 11. The classical random walker result can be interpreted as a probability map, i.e. the<br />
result <strong>of</strong> random walker segmentation is a probability for every pixel to belong to the object or not.<br />
When we apply the stochastic random walker method, the first interpretation <strong>of</strong> the result is that we<br />
compute “probabilities <strong>of</strong> probabilities”, because we are computing the probability distribution <strong>of</strong><br />
the values at every pixel. Let us emphasize that the probability interpretation <strong>of</strong> the classical result is<br />
one possible interpretation only. Mathematically, we are computing the result <strong>of</strong> a diffusion problem,<br />
and the stochastic extension is, in this interpretation, a diffusion problem with stochastic diffusion<br />
coefficient. The results can be interpreted as the stochastic solution <strong>of</strong> the stochastic diffusion problem.<br />
The analog to the probability interpretation is that we computed the probabilities for belonging<br />
to the object in dependence on the input gray value uncertainty.<br />
The stochastic object boundary can be visualized by tracking the deterministic object boundary (the<br />
value 0.5 in the result image) for realizations <strong>of</strong> the random variables. The work <strong>of</strong> Prassni et al. [126]<br />
inspired this kind <strong>of</strong> visualization. The difference is that Prassni et al. [126] visualized the iso-lines<br />
<strong>of</strong> different probabilities, whereas we visualize the same iso-line for realizations <strong>of</strong> the stochastic<br />
image. Fig. 6.3 shows the result <strong>of</strong> such a visualization.<br />
It is possible to compute and visualize other quantities extracted from the segmentation, e.g. the<br />
volume <strong>of</strong> the segmented object. The obvious visualization <strong>of</strong> the stochastic volume is to draw the<br />
PDF <strong>of</strong> the volume. The PDF <strong>of</strong> the segmented volume can be computed from the segmentation by<br />
summing up the random variables at every pixel, because they specify the “probability” that the pixel<br />
belongs to the object. Thus, the random variable v(ξ ) specifying the objects volume is<br />
v(ξ ) =<br />
N<br />
∑<br />
α=1<br />
v α Ψ α (ξ ) := ∑ x i (ξ ) . (6.12)<br />
i∈I<br />
Having a look at the PDF, it is easy to decide whether the image noise influences the segmented<br />
volume strongly or not. If the segmented volume is strongly influenced the PDF is broad, otherwise<br />
the function is narrow. Fig. 6.4 shows the PDF <strong>of</strong> the segmented volume from the street image.<br />
Moreover, the choice <strong>of</strong> the parameter β influences the pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the PDF. A smaller β leads to a<br />
diffuse object boundary and to a broader PDF.<br />
62