09.04.2014 Views

ESTONIAN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 2009

ESTONIAN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 2009

ESTONIAN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 2009

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.4.5. Status of lakes<br />

The ecological status of lakes was assessed on the basis<br />

of biological and physico- chemical quality indicators. In<br />

the process, the status of fish was not taken into account<br />

as the determination of class boundaries for fish is still<br />

in progress.<br />

On the basis of the rating, most Estonian lakes are in the<br />

“good” or “moderate” status (figure 6.14). The so-called 2/3<br />

rule was used to assess the status of lakes. According to this<br />

rule, at least one quality indicator was to be used from each<br />

biological quality element and physico-chemical general<br />

conditions. The number of quality indicators used had to<br />

be at least seven, with all of the indicators having equal<br />

weight. The status rating is assigned to the status category<br />

of 2/3 of the indicators. Some of the quality indicator values<br />

may indicate a quality lower than that of the combined<br />

rating, but the number of such quality indicators should<br />

not exceed 1/3 of the total number of indicators.<br />

The ecological status of Lake Peipsi and Lake Pskov<br />

has worsened in recent years. This is above all due to<br />

eutrophication from excessive phosphorus load. The percentage<br />

of blue-green algae with respect to all algae has<br />

increased in the summer months, while diatom biomass<br />

has decreased. Algal toxin concentrations in water have<br />

repeatedly exceeded the permitted limit values for bathing<br />

water. Due to the proliferation of algae, fish spawns have<br />

become muddy and fish reproduction conditions have<br />

worsened. Overall, the ecological status of Lake Peipsi was<br />

rated moderate and that of Lake Pskov, poor.<br />

The ecological status of Narva reservoir has remained<br />

relatively stable in this decade. For the most part, the<br />

reservoir’s ecosystem behaves similarly to the northern<br />

part of Lake Peipsi. In the last few years, a rise in both<br />

phosphorus and nitrogen concentrations has been observed<br />

in Narva reservoir. Phytoplankton concentrations have<br />

also increased – especially blue-green algae biomass and<br />

chlorophyll a concentrations – as a result of which the<br />

ecological status of the reservoir was rated moderate.<br />

The indicators for the status of Lake Võrtsjärv depend<br />

significantly on the lake’s water level, which in recent<br />

years has been quite low. For this reason, the water quality<br />

and status of the phytoplankton in this water body were<br />

assessed on the basis of data for the last 10 years. The<br />

combined rating of the ecological status of Lake Võrtsjärv<br />

on the basis of phytoplankton, macrophytes and water<br />

quality was deemed good. The major fluctuations in the<br />

water level of recent years make it difficult to distinguish<br />

between natural and anthropogenic changes and thus<br />

reduce the reliability of the rating.<br />

Status of smaller lakes. The existing data made it possible<br />

to assess the status of 152 small lakes J (figure 6.14,<br />

map 6.7). Of the lakes assessed, 17 were in high status, 76<br />

were in good status, 50 were in moderate and 9 were in<br />

poor status. The status of macrophytes in Estonian lakes<br />

is the poorest indicator. Regarding water quality it can<br />

be said that on the basis of nitrogen, over half of the lakes<br />

were in moderate or worse condition, while on the basis of<br />

phosphorus, slightly over 20% of the lakes were in moderate<br />

or worse status. Of the largest lakes, Ülemiste, Maardu<br />

and Harku in Harju County were in moderate condition,<br />

as were Kaiavere in Jõgeva County and Vagula and Tamula<br />

lakes in Võru County. The condition of Veisjärv in Viljandi<br />

County is poor.<br />

high<br />

good<br />

moderate<br />

poor<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

%<br />

0<br />

Viru<br />

Peipsi<br />

Võrtsjärve<br />

Harju<br />

Matsalu<br />

Pärnu<br />

Läänesaarte<br />

Pandivere<br />

Mustjõe<br />

Figure 6.14. Ecological status of small lakes in Estonia, 2004–2008. The number indicates the number of lakes in the given status class.<br />

Data: EEIC.<br />

Read more:<br />

• Advanced WISE water map viewer.<br />

[WWW] http://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/water/mapviewers/<br />

advanced-wise-viewer/<br />

• Estonian Environment Information Centre website.<br />

[WWW] http://www.keskkonnainfo.ee/<br />

index.php?lan=EN&sid=2&tid=2 (state of environment)<br />

• Ministry of the Environment website.<br />

[WWW] http://www.envir.ee/67250 (water)<br />

104<br />

J<br />

Small lakes – all lakes besides Peipsi, Pskov and Võrtsjärv.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!