09.04.2014 Views

ESTONIAN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 2009

ESTONIAN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 2009

ESTONIAN ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 2009

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.2. Emissions<br />

5.2.1. Emissions of acidifying substances<br />

Sulphur and nitrogen compounds react with moisture<br />

in the air to form acids that fall as acid rain and cause<br />

damage to the environment, including forests, water<br />

ecosystems as well as buildings and materials.<br />

Acidification is caused by sulphur dioxide (SO 2<br />

),<br />

nitrogen oxides (NO x<br />

) and ammonia (NH 3<br />

) emitted<br />

into the air due to human activity. The largest sources<br />

of sulphur dioxide emissions are the energy sector and<br />

industry. Nitrogen oxide emissions primarily originate<br />

from transport and the energy sector, while ammonia<br />

emissions come mainly from animal husbandry and<br />

use of fertilizers. Acidification is expressed in terms of<br />

acidification equivalent. The emissions of each pollutant<br />

are converted into acidification potential: SO 2<br />

– 0.03125,<br />

NO x<br />

– 0.02174, NH 3<br />

– 0.05882 A . The emissions reduction<br />

programme requires that emissions not exceed the following<br />

limits by 2015: SO 2<br />

– 43,350 tonnes, NO x<br />

– 36,240<br />

tonnes and NH 3<br />

– 7,330 tonnes. The limits established by<br />

in regulation no. 299 of the Government of the Republic of<br />

20 September 2004, “Limits for total emissions of sulphur<br />

dioxide, nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds<br />

and ammonia discharged from stationary and mobile<br />

pollution sources and terms for achieving them” for 2010<br />

(SO 2<br />

– 100,000 t, NO x<br />

– 60,000 t and NH 3<br />

– 29,000 t)<br />

had for the most part been achieved by 2007, while the<br />

other targets depend on the measures to be implemented<br />

(renovation of power plants, reducing use of oil shale,<br />

developing renewable energy etc) (figure 5.1).<br />

Sulphur dioxide SO 2<br />

In 2007, a total of 2,766 tonnes of sulphur dioxide in<br />

acidification equivalent was emitted into Estonia’s ambient<br />

air, of which the bulk was generated in the combustion<br />

of fuel in the energy and transformation industries (about<br />

92%) and in the manufacturing industry (about 6%). SO 2<br />

primarily originates from oil-shale-fired power plants<br />

in Ida-Viru County. Thus reduction of sulphur dioxide<br />

emissions is in direct dependence on measures implemented<br />

at power plants (renovation of energy generation<br />

units). A small quantity of SO 2<br />

emissions was given off<br />

from non-industrial fuel combustion and transport (use<br />

of motor fuels hat contain sulphur).<br />

Compared to 1990, SO 2<br />

emissions have dropped by<br />

67.5%. The changes were occasioned by economic restructuring<br />

that took place at the beginning of the 1990s, as<br />

a result of which the amount of electricity consumed in<br />

industry dropped significantly. The extent of the use of<br />

other fuels also changed – a transition has occurred from<br />

use of heavy oil with a high sulphur content to combustion<br />

of natural gas and wood. Use of lower-sulphur shale<br />

oil and light fuel oil has increased.<br />

The changes of recent years are due to renovation of<br />

energy units at Eesti and Balti power plants, where the<br />

old dust burning technology was replaced with the new<br />

fluidized bed technology. The new technology means a<br />

rise in the efficiency of the boilers and a reduction in the<br />

amount of oil shale needed. Besides the renovation of the<br />

energy units, emissions reduction was also impacted by<br />

the decommissioning of old energy units at Balti power<br />

plant.<br />

Compared to 2005–2006, sulphur dioxide emissions<br />

increased in 2007. The increase in emissions can be<br />

explained by a 22% increase in the output of Narva Elektrijaamad<br />

AS compared to 2006, owing to the export of<br />

electricity to Finland via the Estlink submarine cable.<br />

Nitrogen oxides NO x<br />

In 2007, around 749 tonnes of nitrogen oxides in<br />

acidification equivalent was discharged into ambient<br />

air in Estonia. Of this, one-half was generated by mobile<br />

sources of pollution (vehicles) from use of motor fuel.<br />

The transport topic is dealt with more thoroughly in<br />

the section on ozone (chapter 5.2.2). The rest of the NO x<br />

emissions was discharged in the process of combustion<br />

of fuels in the energy and transformation industries and<br />

in the manufacturing industry. The primary polluters in<br />

the case of both sulphur dioxides and nitrogen oxides are<br />

power plants in Ida-Viru County.<br />

Compared to 1990, nitrogen oxide emissions have<br />

dropped by 53%. There were no material changes in<br />

nitrogen oxide emissions in specific economic sectors.<br />

Compared to 2005 and 2006, nitrogen oxide emissions<br />

increased in 2007.<br />

Ammonia NH 3<br />

In 2007, a total of 570 tonnes of ammonia in acidification<br />

equivalent was emitted into Estonia’s ambient air,<br />

of which the bulk was generated by agriculture. A small<br />

part of the ammonia was discharged into ambient air<br />

from transport and production processes. In agriculture,<br />

pollution of ambient air with ammonia is primarily due to<br />

animal farming buildings, manure storage facilities and<br />

fields fertilized with manure and mineral fertilizers.<br />

Compared to 1990, ammonia emissions have dropped<br />

by nearly 63%, namely due to a reduction in the share of<br />

agriculture. In the last decade, ammonia emissions have<br />

remained stable.<br />

Compared to other European Union member states,<br />

Estonia’s emissions of pollutants per capita are high, much<br />

greater than the average for the European Union (figure<br />

5.2). The amount of pollution per capita is only exceeded<br />

by Bulgaria, which has heavy industry and burns coal.<br />

Estonia’s high position in the rankings can be attributed<br />

to the large percentage of oil shale with a high-sulphur<br />

and ash content in the Estonian energy sector and the<br />

small population. At the same time, the emissions of SO 2<br />

,<br />

NO x<br />

and NH 3<br />

in Estonia make up only 0.5% of the total<br />

emissions in the European Union.<br />

A<br />

The larger the number, the stronger the oxidant.<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!