14.09.2014 Views

On the Formation of Nitrogen Oxides During the Combustion of ...

On the Formation of Nitrogen Oxides During the Combustion of ...

On the Formation of Nitrogen Oxides During the Combustion of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table D.3: Progression <strong>of</strong> Droplet Vaporization (t Ψ = 18s) [208, 317–319].<br />

Pre-vaporization Droplet diameter D(t Ψ ) in mm Pre-vaporization rate Ψ (Eq. (1.1))<br />

time t Ψ in s Method No. 1 Method No. 2 Method No. 1 Method No. 2<br />

0 1.5500 1.6084 0.0000 0.0000<br />

1 1.5633 1.6225 −0.0260 −0.0266<br />

2 1.5510 1.6268 −0.0020 −0.0347<br />

3 1.5642 1.6288 −0.0277 −0.0386<br />

4 1.5557 1.6227 −0.0110 −0.0270<br />

5 1.5484 1.6164 0.0030 −0.0150<br />

6 1.5371 1.5981 0.0248 0.0191<br />

7 1.5362 1.5864 0.0265 0.0404<br />

8 1.5065 1.5710 0.0819 0.0681<br />

9 1.4938 1.5528 0.1048 0.1001<br />

10 1.4792 1.5359 0.1308 0.1292<br />

11 1.4437 1.5128 0.1920 0.1679<br />

12 1.4267 1.4892 0.2202 0.2063<br />

13 1.4072 1.4653 0.2517 0.2439<br />

14 1.3780 1.4343 0.2974 0.2908<br />

15 1.3500 1.4076 0.3393 0.3297<br />

16 1.3346 1.3773 0.3616 0.3720<br />

17 1.3173 1.3502 0.3862 0.4084<br />

18 1.2983 1.3190 0.4124 0.4485<br />

alent droplet diameter, defined by (a 2 b)/3, where a and b are <strong>the</strong> minor and<br />

major axis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> droplet, respectively. The major difference between “Method<br />

No. 1” and “Method No. 2” is <strong>the</strong> filter that distinguishes between droplet and<br />

background. The droplet diameter D(t Ψ ) increases during <strong>the</strong> first 2 to 3s, and<br />

<strong>the</strong> associated Ψ-value appears to be negative for up to 5s due to <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmal<br />

expansion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> droplet. 1 This is a well-documented behavior for <strong>the</strong> initial<br />

period <strong>of</strong> droplet heating [210, 307, 309, 312, 465]. The droplet diameter<br />

squared increases accordingly, as illustrated in Figure D.5. Considering data<br />

fluctuation and reproducibility as well as <strong>the</strong> deviation from pre-estimated<br />

figures, Method No. 2 shows a higher consistency than Method No. 1. Hence,<br />

it is chosen for data analysis throughout this work. The vaporization rate<br />

for steady-state conditions (t Ψ ≥ 7s) calculates to k = 0.075±0.025 mm 2 s −1 .<br />

Figure D.6 shows corresponding results from <strong>the</strong> drop tower campaign.<br />

1 The experimental results discussed in Chapter 5 are compensated for this effect according to Equation (5.4).<br />

In this context, Chin and Lefebvre [70] studied <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> heat-up period in droplet evaporation in an<br />

analytical way.<br />

227

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!