01.10.2014 Views

Brand Relevance: Making Competitors Irrelevant - always yours

Brand Relevance: Making Competitors Irrelevant - always yours

Brand Relevance: Making Competitors Irrelevant - always yours

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WINNING THE BRAND RELEVANCE BATTLE 35<br />

feasible pathway to substantially higher performance for most<br />

fi rms is to “ exploit some change in your environment — in technology,<br />

consumer tastes, laws, resource prices, or competitive<br />

behavior — and ride that change with quickness and skill. This<br />

path is how most successful companies make it. ” 6<br />

The fi nancial success has some elements that are not often<br />

so obvious. First, a new category or subcategory can represent<br />

a growth platform of its own capable of spawning new businesses.<br />

Second, the new category or subcategory can create<br />

new customers who may have been sitting on the sidelines<br />

because of their perception that existing competitors lack offerings<br />

that fi t them or their needs. Before the Luna energy bar for<br />

women came along, customers were uninterested in the products<br />

that were designed and positioned for men, for macho<br />

men in fact. Before ESPN sports fanatics were confi ned to newspapers<br />

and magazines.<br />

In fact, there is empirical evidence supporting the proposition<br />

that, on average over many decades, an abnormal percentage<br />

of profi ts come to those fi rms that have dominated a new<br />

business area. This evidence comes from a variety of studies that<br />

involve different perspectives, databases, and time frames. We<br />

will review the evidence from fi nancial performance research,<br />

new product research, and perceived innovativeness data.<br />

Financial Performance Research<br />

McKinsey has collected a database of over one-thousand fi rms<br />

(all with sales of over 50 percent in one industry) from fi fteen<br />

industries over forty years. One fi nding was that new entrants<br />

into the database (84 percent of the fi rms were new entrants at<br />

one point) each achieved a higher shareholder return than their<br />

industry average for the fi rst ten years after entry. 7 That return<br />

premium was 13 percent the fi rst year, falling to 3 percent in the<br />

fi fth and never rising above that level for the second fi ve years.<br />

Further, there was an extremely high correlation between industry

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!