01.10.2014 Views

Brand Relevance: Making Competitors Irrelevant - always yours

Brand Relevance: Making Competitors Irrelevant - always yours

Brand Relevance: Making Competitors Irrelevant - always yours

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6 BRAND RELEVANCE<br />

Figure 1.2 The Asahi-Kirin Beer War<br />

Market Share<br />

70<br />

Kirin<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

Asahi<br />

0<br />

1980<br />

Asahi<br />

Dry Beer enters<br />

(1987)<br />

1987<br />

Kirin<br />

Ichiban enters<br />

(1990)<br />

1990<br />

Year<br />

Kirin<br />

Happoshu enters<br />

(1998)<br />

Dry Beer<br />

repositioned<br />

(1995)<br />

1995<br />

1998<br />

2006<br />

Note the importance of brands in the ability of fi rms to<br />

affect category and subcategory position. Kirin Lager captured<br />

the essence of lager and the Kirin heritage. Asahi Super Dry<br />

defi ned and represented the new dry subcategory, even when<br />

Kirin Draft Dry was introduced. Kirin Tanrei was the prime representative<br />

of the happoshu category. And the repositioning of<br />

Asahi Super Dry really repositioned the dry subcategory, because<br />

at that point Asahi was the only viable entry.<br />

The U.S. Computer Industry<br />

Consider also the dynamics of the U.S. computer industry during<br />

the last half century and how these dynamics affected the<br />

winners and losers in the marketplace. The story starts in<br />

the 1960s when seven manufacturers, all backed by big fi rms,<br />

competed for a place in the mainframe space. However, as<br />

“ computers as hardware ” suppliers they became irrelevant in<br />

the face of IBM, who defi ned its offering as a problem - relevant

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!