01.10.2014 Views

Brand Relevance: Making Competitors Irrelevant - always yours

Brand Relevance: Making Competitors Irrelevant - always yours

Brand Relevance: Making Competitors Irrelevant - always yours

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

UNDERSTANDING BRAND RELEVANCE 49<br />

characteristics. If any were missing, the new offering would not<br />

be perceived to be in the SUV subcategory.<br />

Instead of being “ in or out, ” alternately, the offering might<br />

be judged as to how close it is to the category (employing the<br />

concept of fuzzy sets). The result is a “ goodness of fi t ” judgment.<br />

Distance from the category might be based on the number<br />

and identity of characteristics for which a match is missing.<br />

Or it might be based on how far the offering is from the ideal<br />

on dimensions for which the match is less than perfect. The gas<br />

mileage may be lower than would be desired, for example, but<br />

not so low as to exclude the offering from the category.<br />

In contrast, the “ exemplar ” approach is based on the premise<br />

that the category or subcategory can be represented by one<br />

or more “ good examples, ” or exemplars. So for compact hybrids,<br />

the Prius may be the exemplar in that it basically defi nes the<br />

category. Similarly, iPod and TiVo defi ne their own categories,<br />

as do Jell - O, Gortex, Google, and others. New offerings are then<br />

evaluated as to how similar they are to the exemplar. Again,<br />

instead of being in or out of the category, a brand could be measured<br />

according to a “ closeness ” scale.<br />

Which approach will be used when? One factor is whether<br />

an accepted and visible exemplar exists. If so, the exemplar<br />

approach is most likely to be used. However, if the identity<br />

of one or more exemplars is unclear or not well known, then<br />

the customer will be less likely to use the exemplar approach.<br />

If a category, such as low - fat food, evolves based on consumer<br />

trends, and no exemplar has played a defi ning role, then the<br />

customer is likely to employ the attribute - matching approach.<br />

Research also suggests that the attribute - matching process<br />

is more likely to be used when the context is simple, whereas<br />

the exemplar approach will be more likely if the context is more<br />

complex in terms of the number of alternatives, the number of<br />

defi ning dimensions, and the diffi culty of evaluating options<br />

with respect to the dimensions. So if a four - wheel - drive sedan<br />

defi nes a category, a car will be determined to be in or not in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!