01.10.2014 Views

Brand Relevance: Making Competitors Irrelevant - always yours

Brand Relevance: Making Competitors Irrelevant - always yours

Brand Relevance: Making Competitors Irrelevant - always yours

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MARKET DYNAMICS IN THE AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY 99<br />

The gas embargo of 1973 stimulated a government initiative<br />

to create more effi cient cars. It led to the corporate average<br />

fuel economy (CAFE) regulation of 1975, which specifi ed that<br />

the average mpg of each automobile firm must improve over time<br />

(although, somewhat strangely, heavy SUVs and trucks were<br />

excluded, in part because of the political influence of farmers<br />

and small businesspeople who used trucks). Complying with the<br />

CAFE regulations was a challenge for sure. Although the hybrid<br />

was a potential solution, there was little progress in Detroit.<br />

A curious exception was the work of an engineer and inventor:<br />

Victor Wouk had been working on a hybrid under the auspices<br />

of the founder of Motorola, who was worried about air<br />

pollution as early as the 1960s. Wouk was drawn to a hybrid<br />

design because of the limitations of the battery - powered option.<br />

The Environmental Protection Agency, the driver of the initiative,<br />

tested a Wouk vehicle and found that it met the strict<br />

guidelines for emissions and was fuel effi cient. Nevertheless, in<br />

a puzzling decision, the EPA rejected it outright despite the fact<br />

that the world price for oil had not declined substantially. There<br />

were undoubtedly political and interpersonal reasons based<br />

in part on the fact that Wouk was a Detroit outsider. It is not<br />

enough to have the best car if there are barriers to bringing the<br />

car to market that are not overcome.<br />

Even more puzzling was why one of the U.S. manufacturers<br />

did not pick up on the innovation and create a subcategory and<br />

brand. There are a host of potential economic, political, technical,<br />

and market - based explanations. In particular, automobile<br />

manufacturers (who of course infl uence legislators in different<br />

ways) may have been concerned that success would create costly<br />

and inconvenient mandates. In addition, there were perceived<br />

corporate limitations, the risk - adverse culture of the U.S. fi rms,<br />

and strategic momentum toward existing technology. There<br />

might also have been a not - invented - here syndrome. In retrospect,<br />

it may have been an opportunity lost. Even if early models<br />

had not been profi table, improvements over time could have

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!