01.10.2014 Views

Brand Relevance: Making Competitors Irrelevant - always yours

Brand Relevance: Making Competitors Irrelevant - always yours

Brand Relevance: Making Competitors Irrelevant - always yours

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

100 BRAND RELEVANCE<br />

resulted in a dominant position in an attractive market, especially<br />

six years later when the price of oil nearly doubled again.<br />

But Detroit auto manufacturers, their customers, and legislators<br />

have again and again been unwilling to face such contingencies.<br />

In 1978 an auspicious technological development occurred<br />

that was important to the hybrid ’ s future. When a car brakes,<br />

power is dissipated into the air through heat and is thus lost. An<br />

engineer, David Arthurs, developed a way to collect this power<br />

and use it to recharge the batteries. Termed a regenerative braking<br />

system, it did much (along with a host of other innovations)<br />

to make the hybrids of today feasible.<br />

A note about battery - powered cars needs to be inserted here,<br />

because their development is linked to the hybrid in regard<br />

to technology and politics. In 1990, infl uenced by a battery -<br />

powered GM prototype car sponsored by GM ’ s then - CEO Roger<br />

Smith, the California Air Resource Board (CARB), searching<br />

for way to meet the state ’ s Clean Air Act, declared that automobile<br />

companies doing business in the state would have to produce<br />

zero - emission vehicles that made up 2 percent of California<br />

auto sales by 1998, 5 percent by 2001, and 10 percent by 2003.<br />

That regulation stimulated activity in battery - powered cars.<br />

The most notable battery - powered car was the GM EV1 subcompact.<br />

Just over one thousand cars were produced and leased<br />

from 1996 to 1999 at a substantial price premium. However,<br />

given the EV1 experience, particularly its high manufacturing<br />

cost, GM did not have confi dence that a battery - powered car<br />

was viable. GM cars and those of competitors were ultimately<br />

used as evidence in court and in CARB hearings to successfully<br />

argue that the CARB standards were unrealistic and needed to<br />

be relaxed. When CARB relaxed the 1998 standards in a step<br />

toward getting rid of them on the basis that the technology, particularly<br />

in batteries, would not be ready, GM, Ford, and others<br />

gratefully killed the products. GM, in fact, tried to destroy all<br />

such cars on the road. Rick Wagoner, GM ’ s CEO from 2000 to<br />

2009, opined late in 2006 that GM ’ s biggest blunder was to walk

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!