03.11.2014 Views

Demographic Profile of Senior in Wayne County, Michigan

Demographic Profile of Senior in Wayne County, Michigan

Demographic Profile of Senior in Wayne County, Michigan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 13. Ratio <strong>of</strong> Income to Poverty <strong>in</strong> Region 1-C by Community, 1999<br />

Community<br />

Total 65+<br />

Persons Less than _ % <strong>of</strong><br />

Percent by Ratio to<br />

50<br />

P<br />

75<br />

t<br />

100 125 150 50<br />

P<br />

75<br />

t<br />

100 125 150<br />

Region 1-C 129,861 3,040 4,820 7,968 12,628 18,075 2.3 3.7 6.1 9.7 13.9<br />

Allen Park city 5,901 165 214 265 372 574 2.8 3.6 4.5 6.3 9.7<br />

Belleville city 595 29 34 79 118 171 4.9 5.7 13.3 19.8 28.7<br />

Brownstown township 1,332 43 59 99 157 182 3.2 4.4 7.4 11.8 13.7<br />

Canton township 4,579 95 165 253 346 435 2.1 3.6 5.5 7.6 9.5<br />

Dearborn city 15,134 421 759 1,150 1,857 2,579 2.8 5.0 7.6 12.3 17.0<br />

Dearborn Heights city 10,550 260 354 501 800 1,105 2.5 3.4 4.7 7.6 10.5<br />

Ecorse city 1,366 50 86 167 223 385 3.7 6.3 12.2 16.3 28.2<br />

Flat Rock city 798 25 25 38 106 124 3.1 3.1 4.8 13.3 15.5<br />

Garden City city 4,068 108 170 266 449 586 2.7 4.2 6.5 11.0 14.4<br />

Gibraltar city 379 0 12 12 19 56 0.0 3.2 3.2 5.0 14.8<br />

Grosse Ile<br />

1,306 5 18 34 110 115 0.4 1.4 2.6 8.4 8.8<br />

t<br />

Huron<br />

hi<br />

township 1,062 0 5 52 60 118 0.0 0.5 4.9 5.6 11.1<br />

Inkster city 3,142 126 297 422 595 783 4.0 9.5 13.4 18.9 24.9<br />

L<strong>in</strong>coln Park city 5,590 86 123 262 461 729 1.5 2.2 4.7 8.2 13.0<br />

Livonia city 16,018 398 492 835 1,351 1,793 2.5 3.1 5.2 8.4 11.2<br />

Melv<strong>in</strong>dale city 1,448 41 71 133 189 284 2.8 4.9 9.2 13.1 19.6<br />

Northville city 420 8 16 16 51 74 1.9 3.8 3.8 12.1 17.6<br />

Northville township 2,785 58 68 92 138 179 2.1 2.4 3.3 5.0 6.4<br />

Plymouth city 1,337 15 41 48 91 175 1.1 3.1 3.6 6.8 13.1<br />

Plymouth township 3,320 17 26 60 74 160 0.5 0.8 1.8 2.2 4.8<br />

Redford township 7,602 152 231 396 668 935 2.0 3.0 5.2 8.8 12.3<br />

River Rouge city 1,061 28 57 111 149 195 2.6 5.4 10.5 14.0 18.4<br />

Riverview city 2,209 68 76 115 219 307 3.1 3.4 5.2 9.9 13.9<br />

Rockwood city 312 0 0 0 14 42 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.5 13.5<br />

Romulus city 1,756 44 76 217 329 498 2.5 4.3 12.4 18.7 28.4<br />

Southgate city 4,846 122 190 410 539 904 2.5 3.9 8.5 11.1 18.7<br />

Sumpter township 882 25 60 109 166 185 2.8 6.8 12.4 18.8 21.0<br />

Taylor city 6,823 172 233 442 690 970 2.5 3.4 6.5 10.1 14.2<br />

Trenton city 3,708 39 87 151 278 431 1.1 2.3 4.1 7.5 11.6<br />

Van Buren township 1,545 27 57 94 154 198 1.7 3.7 6.1 10.0 12.8<br />

<strong>Wayne</strong> city 1,951 85 126 188 262 392 4.4 6.5 9.6 13.4 20.1<br />

Westland city 10,884 255 479 752 1,134 1,671 2.3 4.4 6.9 10.4 15.4<br />

Woodhaven city 744 16 24 24 87 102 2.2 3.2 3.2 11.7 13.7<br />

Wyandotte city 4,408 57 89 175 372 638 1.3 2.0 4.0 8.4 14.5<br />

The Census Bureau’s special tabulation also provides counts <strong>of</strong> persons 60+ at or below<br />

150% <strong>of</strong> poverty by community with<strong>in</strong> Region 1-C (see Table 14). While the counts add<br />

little to the discussion, they do serve to re<strong>in</strong>force the way need is distributed <strong>in</strong> the region.<br />

Dearborn accounts for the highest share <strong>of</strong> all seniors at or below 150% at 14.4 percent,<br />

followed by Livonia and Westland at 9.1 and 9.2 percent, respectively. Only Dearborn<br />

Heights, Redford township and Taylor, among the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 31 communities, account<br />

for more than 5 percent.<br />

A <strong>Demographic</strong> <strong>Pr<strong>of</strong>ile</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Senior</strong>s <strong>in</strong> PSA 1-C 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!