26.12.2014 Views

Graham R (Ed.) - Anarchism - A Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas Volume One - From Anarchy to Anarchism (300 CE to 1939)

Graham R (Ed.) - Anarchism - A Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas Volume One - From Anarchy to Anarchism (300 CE to 1939)

Graham R (Ed.) - Anarchism - A Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas Volume One - From Anarchy to Anarchism (300 CE to 1939)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Anarcho-Syndicalism /197<br />

straightforward and easier, because it involves those best versed in the goal pursued.<br />

Groups for individual tasks and understanding between these groups in more transcendental<br />

matters: there we have revolutionary organization. Economic organization<br />

is rather more complicated and tricky because <strong>of</strong> the great masses involved and<br />

the multiplicity <strong>of</strong> its intentions. Which is why that system <strong>of</strong> organization has<br />

proved slow work, <strong>to</strong> which the finest intellects have made their contributions, because<br />

such organization <strong>to</strong>o is the real lever <strong>of</strong> revolutionary might and may yet represent<br />

the new society within the old.<br />

So such organization, which we describe as economic in order <strong>to</strong> distinguish it<br />

from the revolutionary, in order <strong>to</strong> avoid misunderstandings, rather than out <strong>of</strong> any<br />

intention <strong>to</strong> say that they are not both at once economic and revolutionary, is the one<br />

that is truly still in need <strong>of</strong> further examination.<br />

Each individual should cling <strong>to</strong> his freedom and his rights, equal with the rights<br />

and freedom <strong>of</strong> his co-associates, and should not allow his freedom and his rights <strong>to</strong><br />

be infringed by anything or anyone in his handiwork, in his centres, in the bosom <strong>of</strong><br />

society, in what is being created for the good <strong>of</strong> all. Trade union association being a<br />

product <strong>of</strong> wills coalescing around specific purposes, those wills need <strong>to</strong> be active;<br />

which is <strong>to</strong> say that each and every person works on behalf <strong>of</strong> the proposed aim and<br />

does not allow some people <strong>to</strong> shoulder all the burden while others remain indifferent<br />

<strong>to</strong> every effort, because that leads <strong>to</strong> a victimhood <strong>of</strong> laziness or bossiness.<br />

We must ensure that the associate finds society not merely a support in his<br />

struggle against capital as he presses home his demands, but also the source <strong>of</strong> the<br />

greatest possible number <strong>of</strong> gratifications and relief from all his most pressing needs.<br />

In short: let the collective be complementary <strong>to</strong> the individual in whatever the latter<br />

cannot achieve by his own unaided efforts, in a setting <strong>of</strong> the most perfect comradeship,<br />

without bullying or tyranny ...<br />

The first task for a trades society <strong>to</strong> tackle should be federation with other societies<br />

from the same trade existing in the region, and, should there be none, <strong>to</strong> set<br />

about forming some and federating with them .<br />

... [O]ccasionally, the use <strong>of</strong>the word federation and even the federative principle<br />

has been shunned because <strong>of</strong> the use made <strong>of</strong>those terms in authoritarian bodies<br />

and in State constitutions. Such wariness is well founded, because a federal or<br />

federative regime based on authoritarian units is not destructive <strong>of</strong> authoritarian<br />

unity, but is, all things considered, just as despotic as a unitary system.<br />

It should not be fo rgotten that every ideal carries within itself an implicit logical<br />

procedure. <strong>One</strong> cannot, if one aspires <strong>to</strong> good and <strong>to</strong> freedom, adopt a barrack-like

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!