26.12.2014 Views

Graham R (Ed.) - Anarchism - A Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas Volume One - From Anarchy to Anarchism (300 CE to 1939)

Graham R (Ed.) - Anarchism - A Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas Volume One - From Anarchy to Anarchism (300 CE to 1939)

Graham R (Ed.) - Anarchism - A Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas Volume One - From Anarchy to Anarchism (300 CE to 1939)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

:1<br />

Anarcliy And <strong>Ed</strong>ucation<br />

64. Bakunin: Integral <strong>Ed</strong>ucation (1869)<br />

<strong>From</strong> the time <strong>of</strong> Godwin, anarchists have recognized the importance <strong>of</strong> education as a<br />

means <strong>of</strong> social liberation, on the one hand, and as an authoritarian means <strong>of</strong> social control,<br />

011 the ot/ler. While Proudhon had advocated general vocational training as a means <strong>of</strong> lessenil1g<br />

the negative effects <strong>of</strong> the divisioll <strong>of</strong> labour (Selection 12), it was Bakullin who developed<br />

the concept <strong>of</strong> "integral education," which was meant <strong>to</strong> Ilelp overcome the division<br />

between intellectual and manual labour, an idea Kropotkin expanded upon in Fields, Fac<strong>to</strong>ries<br />

and Workshops (Selection 34). The following extracts are taken from BakU/lin's essay,<br />

"L'Instruction integrale, " originally published as a series <strong>of</strong> articles in the Swiss<br />

Internationalist paper, L'Egalite, in 1869. The translation is taken from Robert Cutler's The<br />

Basic Bakunin (New York: J)rometheus, 1992), and is reprinted with his kind permission. For<br />

collsislency, I have changed the references <strong>to</strong> "all-round education" back <strong>to</strong> "integral education,<br />

" as that is how the concept is referred <strong>to</strong> in the otller selections.<br />

THE fiRST QUESTION WE MUST NOW consider is whether the working masses can be<br />

fu lly emancipated so long as the education that they receive is inferior <strong>to</strong> that given<br />

<strong>to</strong> the members <strong>of</strong> the bourgeoisie, or, in general, so long as any class <strong>of</strong> any size enjoys,<br />

because <strong>of</strong> its birth, the privileges <strong>of</strong> a better upbringing and a fuller education.<br />

Doesn't this question answer itself Isn't it obvious that <strong>of</strong> two persons endowed<br />

with nearly equal natural intelligence, the one who knows more, who is broaderminded<br />

thanks <strong>to</strong> scientific learning, who grasps more easily and fully the nature <strong>of</strong><br />

his surroundings because he better understands those facts which are called the laws<br />

<strong>of</strong> nature and society and which interconnect natural and social events-that that<br />

person will feel freer in nature and society, and that he will also in fact be the cleverer<br />

and stronger <strong>of</strong> the two The one who knows more will naturally rule over the one<br />

who knows less; and if between two classes just this one difference in education and<br />

upbringing existed, it would be enough <strong>to</strong> produce all the others in short order, and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!