26.12.2014 Views

Graham R (Ed.) - Anarchism - A Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas Volume One - From Anarchy to Anarchism (300 CE to 1939)

Graham R (Ed.) - Anarchism - A Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas Volume One - From Anarchy to Anarchism (300 CE to 1939)

Graham R (Ed.) - Anarchism - A Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas Volume One - From Anarchy to Anarchism (300 CE to 1939)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Epilogue And Prologue To <strong>Volume</strong> 2 / 503<br />

citizen and his representative in Parliament was direct and human; there was a time<br />

when the relationship between a member <strong>of</strong> Parliament and the government was direct<br />

and human; but all that has passed. We have been the victims <strong>of</strong> a process <strong>of</strong> dehumanization<br />

in our political life. Parties have become obedient regiments <strong>of</strong><br />

mercenaries; delegates have been replaced by committees; the paid <strong>of</strong>ficial, the omnipresent<br />

bureaucrat, stands between the citizen and his Parliament. Most departments<br />

<strong>of</strong> national life are controlled by vast and efficient bureaucratic machines<br />

which would continue <strong>to</strong> function <strong>to</strong> a large extent independently-that is <strong>to</strong> say, irrespective<br />

<strong>of</strong> political control.<br />

Universal political franchise has been a failure-that we have <strong>to</strong> confess. Only a<br />

minority <strong>of</strong> the people is politically conscious, and the remainder only exist <strong>to</strong> have<br />

their ignorance and apathy exploited by an unscrupulous Press. But do not let us confuse<br />

universal franchise, which is a system <strong>of</strong> election, with democracy, which is a<br />

principle <strong>of</strong> social organization. Universal franchise is no more essential <strong>to</strong> democracy<br />

than divine right is <strong>to</strong> monarchy. It is a myth: a quite illusory delegation <strong>of</strong><br />

power. Justice, equality, and freedom-these are the true principles <strong>of</strong> democracy,<br />

and it is possible-it has been amply proved by events in Italy and Germany-that<br />

the universal franchise can in no sense guarantee these principles, and may, indeed,<br />

impose a fiction <strong>of</strong> consent where in effect no liberty <strong>of</strong> choice exists.<br />

If you go in<strong>to</strong> a village and propose <strong>to</strong> introduce electric power; if YOll go in<strong>to</strong> a city<br />

street and propose <strong>to</strong> widen it; if you raise the price <strong>of</strong> bread or curtail the hours <strong>of</strong> drinking<br />

licences-then you <strong>to</strong>uch the immediate interests <strong>of</strong> the citizen. Put these questions<br />

<strong>to</strong> the voter and without any coaxing or canvassing he will run <strong>to</strong> the poll.<br />

In short, real politics are local politics. If we can make politics local, we can<br />

make them real. For this reason the universal vote should be restricted <strong>to</strong> the local<br />

unit <strong>of</strong> government, and this local government should control all the immediate interests<br />

<strong>of</strong>the citizen. Such interests as are not controlled by the local council should<br />

be controlled by his local branch <strong>of</strong> the syndicate or soviet <strong>to</strong> which he belongs. His<br />

remoter interests-questions <strong>of</strong> co-operation, intercommunication, and fo reign affa<br />

irs-should be settled by councils <strong>of</strong> delegates elected by the local councils and the<br />

syndicates. Only in that way shall we ever get a democracy <strong>of</strong> vital articulation and efficient<br />

fo rce.<br />

It is important, however, <strong>to</strong> make one qualification without which any democratic<br />

system will fail. A delegate should always be an ad hoc delegate. Once a delegate<br />

separates himself from his natural productive function, once he becomes a<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional delegate, then all the old trouble sets in again. The bureaucratic para-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!