26.12.2014 Views

Graham R (Ed.) - Anarchism - A Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas Volume One - From Anarchy to Anarchism (300 CE to 1939)

Graham R (Ed.) - Anarchism - A Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas Volume One - From Anarchy to Anarchism (300 CE to 1939)

Graham R (Ed.) - Anarchism - A Documentary History of Libertarian Ideas Volume One - From Anarchy to Anarchism (300 CE to 1939)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

434 / ANARCHISM<br />

fe atures Yes, we can. True, it is certainly not a matter <strong>of</strong>a scientific fo rmula fo r<br />

life-no such fo rmula exists-but rather <strong>of</strong> a pretty clear-cut, fa ir definition <strong>of</strong><br />

its visible, palpable, conceivable essence. According <strong>to</strong> this line <strong>of</strong> reasoning,<br />

life is primarily a great synthesis: a vast, complicated whole, an organic, original<br />

whole made up <strong>of</strong> countless motley variations.<br />

2. Life is a synthesis. So what are the essence and originality <strong>of</strong> that synthesis<br />

The essence <strong>of</strong> life is the widest variety <strong>of</strong> its parts-which are in a state <strong>of</strong> perpetual<br />

motio ll at that-simultaneously and equally perpetually displaying a certain<br />

unity, or, rather, a certain equilibrium. The essence <strong>of</strong>life, the essence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sublime synthesis is a constant striving fo r equilibrium, indeed the ongoing<br />

achievement <strong>of</strong> a certain equilibrium amid the greatest diversity and perpetual<br />

motion ...<br />

3. Life is a synthesis. Life (the universe, nature) is equilibrilll1l (a sort <strong>of</strong> oneness) in<br />

diversity alld in l11otioll (or, if one prefers, diversity and motion in equilibrium). As<br />

a result, if anarchism wishes <strong>to</strong> march in step with life, if it wants <strong>to</strong> be one <strong>of</strong>its<br />

organic elements, if it wishes <strong>to</strong> be reconciled with it and <strong>to</strong> arrive at a real result,<br />

instead <strong>of</strong>finding itself at odds with it, only <strong>to</strong> be rejected in the end, it <strong>to</strong>o<br />

must-without renouncing diversity or motion-also and always achieve equilibrium,<br />

synthesis and unity.<br />

But it is not enough just <strong>to</strong> argue that anarchism can be synthetic; it must be<br />

so. Not only is a synthesis <strong>of</strong> anarchism feasible or desirable: it is vital. While retaining<br />

the lively diversity <strong>of</strong> its component parts, and avoiding stagnation and<br />

embracing movement-the essential fe atures <strong>of</strong> its vitality-;:m;m-hism should<br />

at the same time seek equilibrium through that very diversity and movement.<br />

Diversity and movement in the absence <strong>of</strong> equilibrium spell chaos. Equilibrium<br />

without diversity and movement spell stagnation and death. Diversity plus<br />

movement in equilibriul11: that is the synthesis <strong>of</strong> life. <strong>Anarchism</strong> should be varied<br />

and mobile and at the same time balanced, synthetic and one. Otherwise it will<br />

not be life-like.<br />

4. Note, finally, that the true basis <strong>of</strong> diversity and movement in life (with synthesis<br />

as the jumping-<strong>of</strong>f point) is creation, <strong>to</strong> wit, the constant production <strong>of</strong><br />

the new, new combinations, new movements, a new equilibrium. Life is a creative<br />

diversity. Life is equilibrium set ill uninterrupted creatioll . As a result, no anarchist<br />

could argue that "his" current is the sole and constant truth and that all<br />

the other strands within anarchism are nonsense. On the contrary: it is non-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!