18.01.2015 Views

integration of solid oxide fuel cells and ... - Ea Energianalyse

integration of solid oxide fuel cells and ... - Ea Energianalyse

integration of solid oxide fuel cells and ... - Ea Energianalyse

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5. SIMULATION AND RESULTS<br />

tricity wise it is a good idea to increase the anode recycling 5 . It can also<br />

be seen from the green line in figure 5.17B that the recycling fraction can<br />

not be below 0,6, since the OC ratio at the anode inlet will then fall below<br />

2, which would leat to carbon depositing.<br />

The COP <strong>of</strong> the absorption unit decreases with increased anode recycling.<br />

This is mainly due to the SOFC using a bigger fraction <strong>of</strong> the energy<br />

in the <strong>fuel</strong> to produce electricity, thereby leaving less heat for the absorption<br />

cooling unit. So although the electricity generation raises when<br />

the recycling is increased, the decrease in COP ABS,f uel is about twice as<br />

big. So for each kW electricity gained, 2kW cooling is lost.<br />

SOFC load (i d )<br />

In certain situations, such as during a heat wave, it might be desirable to<br />

generate as much cooling as possible even if it would severely lower the<br />

electricity production. In such cases more <strong>of</strong> the energy in the <strong>fuel</strong> could<br />

be used for the absorption unit <strong>and</strong> less for the SOFC system. Given a<br />

fixed number (<strong>and</strong> size) <strong>of</strong> stacks, this can be done in two ways, which<br />

will be compared in the following:<br />

1. Lowering U f : All <strong>fuel</strong> is still sent through the SOFC. But less<br />

current is drawn, <strong>and</strong> hence the utilization factor decreases, leaving<br />

more <strong>fuel</strong> for the burner.<br />

2. Fuel Bypass: Only some <strong>of</strong> the <strong>fuel</strong> is sent through the SOFC, while<br />

the rest is fed directly to the burner (completely bypassing the <strong>fuel</strong><br />

cell). The utilization factor <strong>of</strong> the <strong>fuel</strong> cell remains constant at 0,7.<br />

Figure 5.18 compares the two methods. When Fuel Bypassing (2) is<br />

used, the current density can go all the way from 0 to 3000A/m 2 6 .<br />

But in case (1) where all the <strong>fuel</strong> has to go through the SOFC, the<br />

current density may not fall below 2100A/m 2 . Because when all the <strong>fuel</strong> is<br />

sent through the pre reformer <strong>and</strong> <strong>fuel</strong> cell, most <strong>of</strong> it is reformed, which<br />

5 The model does, however, not include blower power for the recycling blower, but<br />

since the anode side volume flow is quite small, it should not consume especially much<br />

power<br />

6 It has been chosen to monitor the current density, since it is easily comparable to<br />

<strong>fuel</strong> <strong>cells</strong> <strong>of</strong> other sizes due to its independence <strong>of</strong> size<br />

130

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!