18.01.2015 Views

integration of solid oxide fuel cells and ... - Ea Energianalyse

integration of solid oxide fuel cells and ... - Ea Energianalyse

integration of solid oxide fuel cells and ... - Ea Energianalyse

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7. DISCUSSION<br />

This leads to the next uncertainty - the lifetime which has been<br />

assumed to be 10 years. This is a lot longer than what is possible today.<br />

But as seen in figure 2.7 (page 36), the pr<strong>of</strong>itability doesn’t depend so<br />

much on lifetime. So even if it is just 5 years, the gains from using the<br />

SOFC is less than 10% smaller than if the lifetime was 10 years.<br />

It must also be remembered that for all the calculations (<strong>of</strong> both SOFC,<br />

ABS, <strong>and</strong> ECH) installation <strong>and</strong> maintenance costs have been neglected.<br />

But even if these costs sum up to be as large as the purchase price <strong>of</strong><br />

SOFC unit during its 10 years lifetime, the pay back time <strong>of</strong> the SOFC<br />

system will increase from around 1 to 1,5 years.<br />

The model has been made as steady state <strong>and</strong> the selling <strong>and</strong> buying<br />

prices <strong>of</strong> electricity have been assumed equal in the calculations in lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> better data. In reality the sale price is likely to be lower than the<br />

purchase price, but since the cost <strong>of</strong> the SOFC was seen not to have so<br />

big an influence on the pr<strong>of</strong>itability, it might be a good idea to buy a unit<br />

50% larger than average load, so it could be regulated up <strong>and</strong> down.<br />

ABS unit<br />

The ABS unit would give an extra gain <strong>of</strong> around 1,5 mil. DKK during<br />

its 10 years expected lifetime which is quite good considering that the<br />

additional purchase price <strong>of</strong> the ABS unit is only around 0,5 mil. DKK. 7 .<br />

This way the pay back time <strong>of</strong> the ABS unit becomes around 1,5 years<br />

for the hot climate, assuming the purchase price is 3700DKK/kW. If the<br />

price were doubled, the pay back time would be 6 years. But the ABS<br />

units are (in contrast to SOFCs) already on the market today, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

estimated price is hence much more accurate than the estimated price <strong>of</strong><br />

the SOFC. There are however not so many suppliers <strong>of</strong> ABS units, <strong>and</strong><br />

very few <strong>of</strong> them make double stage units, so the price is still somewhat<br />

uncertain, <strong>and</strong> one could imagine that it would decrease if the market<br />

grew.<br />

But as mentioned, the installation <strong>and</strong> maintenance costs have been<br />

neglected for all units. If maintenance <strong>and</strong> installation costs for the ABS<br />

sums up to be the same as the purchase price for the unit (during its 10<br />

years lifetime), the pay back time <strong>of</strong> the ABS unit will increase from 1,5<br />

7 The actual price <strong>of</strong> the ABS unit is 1mio DKK, but the supplementary ECH unit<br />

can be smaller than if no ABS were used, so the cost <strong>of</strong> the ECH decreases from 1,4mio<br />

DKK to 0,9mio DKK<br />

172

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!