01.02.2015 Views

69249454-chandler-semiotics

69249454-chandler-semiotics

69249454-chandler-semiotics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ANALYSING STRUCTURES 93<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8222<br />

9<br />

10<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

20<br />

1222<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

30<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7222<br />

It is a feature of culture that binary oppositions come to seem<br />

natural to members of a culture. Many pairings of concepts (such<br />

as male–female and mind–body) are familiar within a culture and<br />

may seem commonsensical distinctions for everyday communicational<br />

purposes even if some of them may be regarded as ‘false<br />

dichotomies’ in critical contexts. The opposition of self–other (or<br />

subject–object) is psychologically fundamental. The mind imposes<br />

some degree of constancy on the dynamic flux of experience<br />

by defining ‘the self’ in relation to ‘the other’. The neo-Freudian<br />

psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan argued that initially, in the primal realm<br />

of ‘the Real’ (where there is no absence, loss or lack), the infant has<br />

no centre of identity and experiences no clear boundaries between<br />

itself and the external world. The child emerges from the real and<br />

enters ‘the Imaginary’ at the age of about 6 to 18 months, before<br />

the acquisition of speech. This is a private psychic realm in which<br />

the construction of the self as subject is initiated. In the realm of<br />

visual images, we find our sense of self reflected back by an other<br />

with whom we identify. Lacan describes a defining moment in the<br />

imaginary which he calls ‘the mirror phase’, when seeing one’s<br />

mirror image (and being told by one’s mother, ‘That’s you!’) induces<br />

a strongly defined illusion of a coherent and self-governing personal<br />

identity. This marks the child’s emergence from a matriarchal state<br />

of ‘nature’ into the patriarchal order of culture. As the child gains<br />

mastery within the pre-existing ‘symbolic order’ (the public domain<br />

of verbal language), language (which can be mentally manipulated)<br />

helps to foster the individual’s sense of a conscious self residing<br />

in an ‘internal world’ which is distinct from ‘the world outside’.<br />

However, a degree of individuality and autonomy is surrendered to<br />

the constraints of linguistic conventions, and the self becomes a more<br />

fluid and ambiguous relational signifier rather than a relatively fixed<br />

entity. Subjectivity is dynamically constructed through discourse.<br />

MARKEDNESS<br />

Oppositions are rarely equally weighted. The Russian linguist and<br />

semiotician Roman Jakobson introduced the theory of markedness:<br />

‘Every single constituent of any linguistic system is built on an

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!