01.02.2015 Views

69249454-chandler-semiotics

69249454-chandler-semiotics

69249454-chandler-semiotics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

722<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

20<br />

122<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

30<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7222<br />

2<br />

SIGNS AND THINGS<br />

While <strong>semiotics</strong> is often encountered in the form of textual analysis,<br />

there is far more to <strong>semiotics</strong> than this. Indeed, one cannot engage<br />

in the semiotic study of how meanings are made in texts and cultural<br />

practices without adopting a philosophical stance in relation to the<br />

nature of signs, representation and reality. We have already seen how<br />

the Saussurean and Peircean models of the sign have different philosophical<br />

implications. For those who adopt the stance that reality<br />

always involves representation and that signs are involved in the<br />

construction of reality, <strong>semiotics</strong> is unavoidably a form of philosophy.<br />

No semiotician or philosopher would be so naïve as to treat<br />

signs such as words as if they were the things for which they stand,<br />

but as we shall see, this occurs at least sometimes in the psychological<br />

phenomenology of everyday life and in the uncritical<br />

framework of casual discourse.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!