01.02.2015 Views

69249454-chandler-semiotics

69249454-chandler-semiotics

69249454-chandler-semiotics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GLOSSARY 263<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8222<br />

9<br />

10<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

20<br />

1222<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

30<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7222<br />

spatial (e.g. in paintings or photographs). See also paradigmatic<br />

analysis, syntagmatic analysis.<br />

syntagmatic analysis Syntagmatic analysis is a structuralist technique<br />

which seeks to establish the ‘surface structure’ of a text<br />

and the relationships between its parts. See also paradigmatic<br />

analysis, syntagm.<br />

text Most broadly, this term is used to refer to anything which can<br />

be ‘read’ for meaning; to some theorists, the world is ‘social<br />

text’. Although the term appears to privilege written texts (it<br />

seems graphocentric and logocentric), to most semioticians a<br />

text is a system of signs (in the form of words, images, sounds<br />

and/or gestures). The term is often used to refer to recorded<br />

(e.g. written) texts which are independent of their users (used<br />

in this sense the term excludes unrecorded speech). See also<br />

representation.<br />

tokens and types Peirce made a distinction between tokens and<br />

types. In relation to words in a text, a count of the tokens would<br />

be a count of the total number of words used (regardless of<br />

type), while a count of the types would be a count of the<br />

different words used (ignoring any repetition). The medium<br />

used may determine whether a text is a type which is its own<br />

sole token (unique original) or simply one token among many<br />

of its type (‘a copy without an original’). See also digital signs.<br />

transcendent(al) signified Derrida argued that dominant ideological<br />

discourse relies on the metaphysical illusion of a transcendental<br />

signified – an ultimate referent at the heart of a signifying<br />

system which is portrayed as ‘absolute and irreducible’, stable,<br />

timeless and transparent – as if it were independent of and prior<br />

to that system. All other signifieds within that signifying system<br />

are subordinate to this dominant central signified which is the<br />

final meaning to which they point. Without such a foundational<br />

term to provide closure for meaning, every signified functions<br />

as a signifier in an endless play of signification. See also deconstruction,<br />

empty signifier, markedness.<br />

transformation, rules of Lévi-Strauss argued that new structural patterns<br />

within a culture are generated from existing ones through<br />

formal rules of transformation based on systematic similarities,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!