01.02.2015 Views

69249454-chandler-semiotics

69249454-chandler-semiotics

69249454-chandler-semiotics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CODES 157<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8222<br />

9<br />

10<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

20<br />

1222<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

30<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7222<br />

of amazement or even disbelief generated by encountering such<br />

‘counter-intuitive’ gendering of colours serves to alert us to a realization<br />

that some of the codes which seem most natural may be<br />

rather more arbitrary than we had assumed. Reading the justification<br />

in the passage for pink being deemed more suitable for boys<br />

than for girls may seem initially to be an amusing rationalization,<br />

but the realization quickly dawns that our own rationale for the<br />

opposite case is hardly immune from the same judgement. Such<br />

revelatory moments powerfully suggest the denaturalizing potential<br />

of <strong>semiotics</strong>.<br />

TEXTUAL CODES<br />

Every text is a system of signs organized according to codes and subcodes<br />

which reflect certain values, attitudes, beliefs, assumptions and<br />

practices. Codes transcend single texts, linking them together in an<br />

interpretive framework which is used by their producers and interpreters.<br />

In creating texts we select and combine signs in relation to<br />

the codes with which we are familiar. Codes help to simplify phenomena<br />

in order to make it easier to communicate experiences. In<br />

reading texts, we interpret signs with reference to what seem to be<br />

appropriate codes. This helps to limit their possible meanings.<br />

Usually the appropriate codes are obvious, overdetermined by all<br />

sorts of contextual cues. The medium employed clearly influences the<br />

choice of codes. In this sense we routinely ‘judge a book by its cover’.<br />

We can typically identify a text as a poem simply by the way in which<br />

it is set out on the page. The use of what is sometimes called ‘scholarly<br />

apparatus’ (such as introductions, acknowledgements, section<br />

headings, tables, diagrams, notes, references, bibliographies, appendices<br />

and indexes) – is what makes academic texts immediately identifiable<br />

as such to readers. Such cueing is part of the metalingual<br />

function of signs. With familiar codes we are rarely conscious of our<br />

acts of interpretation, but occasionally a text requires us to work a little<br />

harder – for instance, by pinning down the most appropriate signified<br />

for a key signifier (as in jokes based on word play) – before we<br />

can identify the relevant codes for making sense of the text as a whole.<br />

Textual codes do not determine the meanings of texts but dominant

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!