01.02.2015 Views

69249454-chandler-semiotics

69249454-chandler-semiotics

69249454-chandler-semiotics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

152<br />

SEMIOTICS: THE BASICS<br />

• symmetry – symmetrical areas tend to be seen as figures<br />

against asymmetrical backgrounds;<br />

• surroundedness – areas which can be seen as surrounded<br />

by others tend to be perceived as figures.<br />

All of these principles of perceptual organization serve the overarching<br />

principle of prägnanz, which is that the simplest and most<br />

stable interpretations are favoured.<br />

What the Gestalt principles of perceptual organization suggest<br />

is that we may be predisposed towards interpreting ambiguous<br />

images in one way rather than another by universal principles. We<br />

may accept such a proposition at the same time as accepting that<br />

such predispositions may also be generated by other factors.<br />

Similarly, we may accept the Gestalt principles while at the same<br />

time regarding other aspects of perception as being learned and<br />

culturally variable rather than innate. The Gestalt principles can be<br />

seen as reinforcing the notion that the world is not simply and objectively<br />

‘out there’ but is constructed in the process of perception. As<br />

Bill Nichols comments, ‘a useful habit formed by our brains must<br />

not be mistaken for an essential attribute of reality. Just as we must<br />

learn to read an image, we must learn to read the physical world.<br />

Once we have developed this skill (which we do very early in life),<br />

it is very easy to mistake it for an automatic or unlearned process,<br />

just as we may mistake our particular way of reading, or seeing, for<br />

a natural, ahistorical and noncultural given’ (Nichols 1981, 12).<br />

We are rarely aware of our own habitual ways of seeing the<br />

world. We are routinely anaesthetized to a psychological mechanism<br />

called ‘perceptual constancy’ which stabilizes the relative shifts in<br />

the apparent shapes and sizes of people and objects in the world<br />

around us as we change our visual viewpoints in relation to them.<br />

Without mechanisms such as categorization and perceptual constancy<br />

the world would be no more than what William James called a ‘great<br />

blooming and buzzing confusion’ (James 1890, 488). Perceptual<br />

constancy ensures that ‘the variability of the everyday world becomes<br />

translated by reference to less variable codes. The environment<br />

becomes a text to be read like any other text’ (Nichols 1981, 26).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!