Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
TEXTUAL INTERACTIONS 185<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8222<br />
9<br />
10<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
20<br />
1222<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
30<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7222<br />
that in any given situation several functions may operate in a ‘hierarchical<br />
order’, but that a dominant function influences the general<br />
character of the ‘message’. For instance, the poetic function (which<br />
is intended to refer to any creative use of language rather than simply<br />
to poetry) highlights ‘the palpability of signs’, undermining any<br />
sense of a natural or transparent connection between a signifier and<br />
a referent (Jakobson 1960, 356). In Jakobson’s model, messages and<br />
meanings cannot be isolated from such constitutive factors. He added<br />
that ‘the question of presence and hierarchy of those basic functions<br />
which we observe in language . . . must be applied also to the other<br />
semiotic systems . . . A parallel investigation of verbal, musical,<br />
pictorial, choreographic, theatrical, and cinematographic arts belongs<br />
to the most imperative and fruitful duties of semiotic science’<br />
(Jakobson 1970, 458).<br />
As we have seen, in contrast to the earlier structuralist<br />
model, Jakobson allocated a role for a situational context and stressed<br />
the importance of parole – the contingency of ‘speech events’.<br />
However, his embedded functions are systemic representations of<br />
‘frozen’ human purposes and he did not address the dynamic, shifting<br />
purposes of those involved in particular acts of communication or<br />
the social frameworks within which communication occurs. His<br />
theoretical frameworks opened up new pathways but he left to sociolinguists<br />
and socio-semiotic researchers the task of investigating<br />
specific, socially situated acts of communication: this, in practice,<br />
was beyond the scope of even the most radical of the original<br />
structural linguists.<br />
While these earlier models had focused on interpersonal<br />
communication, in an essay entitled ‘Encoding/decoding’ (Hall 1980,<br />
originally published as ‘Encoding and decoding in television<br />
discourse’ in 1973), the British sociologist Stuart Hall proposed a<br />
model of mass communication which highlighted the importance of<br />
signifying practices within relevant codes. A televisual text emerged<br />
as ‘meaningful’ discourse from processes of encoding and decoding.<br />
Each of these processes involved ‘meaning structures’ which consisted<br />
of ‘frameworks of knowledge’, ‘relations of production’ and<br />
‘technical infrastructure’. Despite the apparent symmetry, Hall<br />
rejected textual determinism, noting that ‘decodings do not follow