01.02.2015 Views

69249454-chandler-semiotics

69249454-chandler-semiotics

69249454-chandler-semiotics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TEXTUAL INTERACTIONS 185<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8222<br />

9<br />

10<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

20<br />

1222<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

30<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7222<br />

that in any given situation several functions may operate in a ‘hierarchical<br />

order’, but that a dominant function influences the general<br />

character of the ‘message’. For instance, the poetic function (which<br />

is intended to refer to any creative use of language rather than simply<br />

to poetry) highlights ‘the palpability of signs’, undermining any<br />

sense of a natural or transparent connection between a signifier and<br />

a referent (Jakobson 1960, 356). In Jakobson’s model, messages and<br />

meanings cannot be isolated from such constitutive factors. He added<br />

that ‘the question of presence and hierarchy of those basic functions<br />

which we observe in language . . . must be applied also to the other<br />

semiotic systems . . . A parallel investigation of verbal, musical,<br />

pictorial, choreographic, theatrical, and cinematographic arts belongs<br />

to the most imperative and fruitful duties of semiotic science’<br />

(Jakobson 1970, 458).<br />

As we have seen, in contrast to the earlier structuralist<br />

model, Jakobson allocated a role for a situational context and stressed<br />

the importance of parole – the contingency of ‘speech events’.<br />

However, his embedded functions are systemic representations of<br />

‘frozen’ human purposes and he did not address the dynamic, shifting<br />

purposes of those involved in particular acts of communication or<br />

the social frameworks within which communication occurs. His<br />

theoretical frameworks opened up new pathways but he left to sociolinguists<br />

and socio-semiotic researchers the task of investigating<br />

specific, socially situated acts of communication: this, in practice,<br />

was beyond the scope of even the most radical of the original<br />

structural linguists.<br />

While these earlier models had focused on interpersonal<br />

communication, in an essay entitled ‘Encoding/decoding’ (Hall 1980,<br />

originally published as ‘Encoding and decoding in television<br />

discourse’ in 1973), the British sociologist Stuart Hall proposed a<br />

model of mass communication which highlighted the importance of<br />

signifying practices within relevant codes. A televisual text emerged<br />

as ‘meaningful’ discourse from processes of encoding and decoding.<br />

Each of these processes involved ‘meaning structures’ which consisted<br />

of ‘frameworks of knowledge’, ‘relations of production’ and<br />

‘technical infrastructure’. Despite the apparent symmetry, Hall<br />

rejected textual determinism, noting that ‘decodings do not follow

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!