01.02.2015 Views

69249454-chandler-semiotics

69249454-chandler-semiotics

69249454-chandler-semiotics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CODES 149<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8222<br />

9<br />

10<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

20<br />

1222<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

30<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7222<br />

into groups. Different theorists favour different taxonomies, and<br />

while structuralists often follow the ‘principle of parsimony’ –<br />

seeking to find the smallest number of groups deemed necessary –<br />

‘necessity’ is defined by purposes. No taxonomy is innocently neutral<br />

and devoid of ideological assumptions. One might start from a fundamental<br />

divide between analogue and digital codes, from a division<br />

according to sensory channels, from a distinction between verbal and<br />

non-verbal, and so on. Many semioticians take human language as<br />

their starting point. The primary and most pervasive code in any<br />

society is its dominant natural language, within which (as with other<br />

codes) there are many ‘sub-codes’. A fundamental sub-division of<br />

language into spoken and written forms – at least insofar as it relates<br />

to whether the text is detached from its maker at the point of reception<br />

– is often regarded as representing a broad division into different<br />

codes rather than merely sub-codes. One theorist’s code is another’s<br />

sub-code and the value of the distinction needs to be demonstrated.<br />

Stylistic and personal codes (or idiolects) are often described as subcodes<br />

(e.g. Eco 1976, 263, 272). The various kinds of codes overlap,<br />

and the semiotic analysis of any text or practice involves considering<br />

several codes and the relationships between them. A range of<br />

typologies of codes can be found in the literature of <strong>semiotics</strong>. I<br />

refer here only to those which are most widely mentioned in the<br />

context of media, communication and cultural studies (this particular<br />

tripartite framework is my own).<br />

SOCIAL CODES<br />

• verbal language (phonological, syntactical, lexical, prosodic<br />

and paralinguistic subcodes);<br />

• bodily codes (bodily contact, proximity, physical orientation,<br />

appearance, facial expression, gaze, head-nods, gestures and<br />

posture);<br />

• commodity codes (fashions, clothing, cars);<br />

• behavioural codes (protocols, rituals, role-playing, games).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!