03.03.2015 Views

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

96 <strong>Strengthening</strong> <strong>Communities</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>Neighborhood</strong> <strong>Data</strong><br />

The final examples of developing a framework to combine individual<br />

indicators are organizations that seek to measure the extent to which<br />

neighborhoods have access to full-service grocery stores and, in particular,<br />

to identify “food deserts.” In 2011, TRF, a community development<br />

financial institution, published an analysis on the Limited Supermarket<br />

Access Area Score (Califano et al. 2011). The authors defined a limited<br />

supermarket access area as one in which residents must travel significantly<br />

farther to reach a supermarket than the comparatively acceptable<br />

distance traveled by residents in well-served areas. 11 TRF defines comparatively<br />

acceptable as the distance that residents of well-served areas<br />

(block groups <strong>with</strong> incomes greater than 120% of the area’s median<br />

income) travel to the nearest supermarket. The data sources included<br />

Trade Dimensions for supermarket locations; the Decennial Census for<br />

population, households, and residential land area; ACS data for household<br />

income; and the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure<br />

Survey for demand for food at home. TRF also published block group<br />

data for the nation on their PolicyMap data portal (described below).<br />

In 2013 the US Department of Agriculture introduced complementary<br />

data and the Food Access Research Atlas, an online mapping tool. In their<br />

definition, a census tract is considered to have low access if a significant<br />

number or share of individuals in the tract is far from a supermarket.<br />

Big <strong>Data</strong><br />

The administrative and primary data sources listed above are similar to<br />

those available to NNIP partners in the mid 1990s. The technological<br />

advances described in the next section create the potential for new types<br />

of data sources for neighborhood indicators. Many of the new sources<br />

loosely fall under the umbrella of “big data,” which refers to data that have<br />

levels of volume, velocity, and/or variety that traditional computational<br />

techniques cannot handle. The commercial sector already leverages big<br />

data for marketing, and Fleming’s essay at the end of chapter 2 sets out<br />

aspirational goals for wider use of big data by government. Universities<br />

have developed specialized centers to advance analytic techniques using<br />

big data to the benefit of the public sector and wider community. These<br />

centers include the Center for Urban Science and Progress at New York<br />

University, the Urban Center for Computation and <strong>Data</strong> at the University<br />

of Chicago, and the Event and Pattern Detection Laboratory at Carnegie<br />

Mellon University.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!