03.03.2015 Views

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Progress in <strong>Data</strong> and Technology 101<br />

aggregate the data to create neighborhood indicators. The pairing of this<br />

data and technology certainly was a prerequisite for the NNIP model,<br />

and it also affected local governments, as related in Fleming’s essay in<br />

chapter 2. Esri currently dominates the desktop GIS market in the public<br />

sector <strong>with</strong> its ArcMap software, but open source mapping software and<br />

online services are growing in popularity. For now, the wide adoption of<br />

Esri’s products provide a default format for file sharing and student and<br />

staff training.<br />

<strong>Data</strong> Portals: Delivery, Visualization, and Analysis<br />

In addition to facilitating the collection and processing of data, technology<br />

has resulted in new tools to share, visualize, and analyze data.<br />

Since 2010, the number of data and indicators portals has exploded, and<br />

continuous advances in available technology have led to a constantly<br />

shifting environment. The following discussion is organized by the type<br />

of organization that stewards the data portals, <strong>with</strong> an emphasis on the<br />

growth in nonprofit systems.<br />

Nonprofit Portals<br />

Local data intermediaries pioneered the field of online community information<br />

in the late 1990s <strong>with</strong> websites that organized data and indicators<br />

to support community action. One set of early systems shared a common<br />

purpose: to assemble data on individual properties in one place in order to<br />

predict and combat financial disinvestment and building abandonment.<br />

Snow et al. (2003) documents the origin and contents of these “early warning<br />

systems” in Chicago, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, and Philadelphia. 16 The<br />

latter three emerged in the late 1990s, but the Center for <strong>Neighborhood</strong><br />

Technology led the way more than a decade earlier by unveiling Chicago’s<br />

<strong>Neighborhood</strong> Early Warning System in 1984 using shared floppy disks. 17<br />

These systems combined community-collected data <strong>with</strong> administrative<br />

data on land use, code violations, water arrears, and property tax delinquencies.<br />

They enabled community development corporation staff, city<br />

officials, and residents to access an unprecedented amount of integrated<br />

information to track problem properties through user interfaces tailored<br />

for their needs.<br />

Early warning systems largely focused on detailed parcel information,<br />

but other early data tools centered on aggregated local data.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!