03.03.2015 Views

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

98 <strong>Strengthening</strong> <strong>Communities</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>Neighborhood</strong> <strong>Data</strong><br />

Open Government <strong>Data</strong><br />

The open government data movement is founded on the premise that<br />

technology can improve the transparency of processes and information<br />

so that citizens can hold governments accountable. Advocates view government<br />

data as a public good that should be available to the taxpayers<br />

that funded their creation. Open data can also encourage citizen engagement<br />

in government decisionmaking. Another argument for open data<br />

is the added value that government data can bring to the private sector<br />

and society in general. 12 Sanders’s essay at the end of this chapter<br />

describes the advancement of this idea by the Obama administration<br />

and local governments, noting it is just one component of the larger<br />

agenda for delivering relevant information to communities. Large cities<br />

like Chicago; San Francisco; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and New York<br />

have taken the lead in open data, but the efforts of groups like the Sunlight<br />

Foundation and the Open Knowledge Foundation have promoted<br />

the ideas more broadly. As of summer 2013, data.gov listed open data<br />

projects from 40 states and 41 counties and cities in the United States.<br />

This movement will continue to increase the availability of nonconfidential<br />

data relevant to neighborhood indicators, notably reported crime,<br />

311 service requests, and property-related data. Right now, the volume of<br />

raw data means that data analysts or software developers are the primary<br />

users of these systems. Cities rarely publish extensive documentation or<br />

even basic metadata for the files. The tasks of cleaning the data and crafting<br />

appropriate indicators still remain for local data intermediaries and<br />

other analysts, but readily available access will save users time and promote<br />

cross-city analysis (Pettit et al. 2014a).<br />

<strong>Data</strong> Standards<br />

The development of standards (i.e., defined structures for different types<br />

of data) is another growing trend related to government data that could<br />

facilitate the availability and use of neighborhood indicators. In mid-<br />

2009, the District of Columbia government and entrepreneurs from<br />

SeeClickFix developed specifications for data in 311 systems, centralized<br />

call centers, and online systems maintained by local governments<br />

for residents to submit service requests for problems such as potholes,<br />

bulk garbage pickups, or broken streetlights. 13 With the participation of<br />

the organization Open Plans and other pioneer cities, the specification

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!