2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

Recommendations

Info

Using Data for Neighborhood Improvement 183 Kubisch, Anne C., Patricia Auspos, Prudence Brown, and Tom Dewar. 2010. Voices from the Field III: Lessons and Challenges from Two Decades of Community Change Efforts. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute. Kubisch, Anne C., Prudence Brown, Robert Chaskin, J. Hirota, Mark Joseph, Harold Richman, and M. Roberts. 1997. Voices from the Field: Learning from the Early Work of Comprehensive Community Initiatives. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute. LISC Chicago. 2011. Report to Donors, 2011. Chicago: LISC Chicago. LISC. 2013. Neighborhood Monitoring Reports, February. Unpublished report. Miller, Anita, and Tom Burns. 2006. Going Comprehensive: Anatomy of an Initiative That Worked: CCRP in the South Bronx. Philadelphia, PA: OMG Center for Collaborative Learning. December. Milligan, Sharon, Claudia Coulton, Peter York, and Ronald Register. 1998. “Implementing a Theory of Change Evaluation in the Cleveland Community Building Initiative.” In New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives: Volume 2: Theory, Measurement, and Analysis, edited by Karen Fulbright-Anderson, Anne C. Kubisch, and James P. Connel (45–85). Washington, DC: Aspen Institute. National Congress for Community Economic Development. 1989. Against All Odds: The Achievements of Community-Based Development Organizations. Washington, DC: National Congress for Community Economic Development. National Congress for Community Economic Development. 2005. Reaching New Heights: Trends and Achievements of Community-Based Development Organizations. Washington, DC: National Congress for Community Economic Development. Orzag, Peter R., Melody Barnes, Adolfo Carrion, and Lawrence Summers. 2009. “Developing Effective Place-Based Policies for the FY 2011 Budget.” Memorandum. Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget, Domestic Policy Council, Office of Urban Affairs, and National Economic Council. August 11. Paloma, Marjorie. 2012. “The Intersection of Health, Philanthropy and Housing.” Shelterforce Spring. Accessed February 7, 2014. http://www.shelterforce.org/article/2768/ the_intersection_of_health_philanthropy_and_housing/. Pastor, Manuel, and Margery Austin Turner. 2010. Reducing Poverty and Economic Distress after ARRA: Potential Roles for Place-Conscious Strategies. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. April. Pettit, Kathryn L. S., and G. Thomas Kingsley. 2011. “Framework: The New Potential for Data in Managing Neighborhood Change.” In Putting Data to Work: Data-Driven Approaches to Strengthening Neighborhoods. Washington, DC: Federal Reserve Board of Governors. December. Popkin, Susan, Jennifer Comey, Molly Scott, Elsa Falkenberger, Chantal Haley, and Amanda Mireles. 2011. DC Promise Neighborhood Initiative: Needs Assessment and Segmentation Analysis. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Promise Neighborhoods Institute. 2011. What Is a Promise Neighborhood? Oakland, CA: Promise Neighborhoods Institute. http://www.promiseneighborhoodsinstitute. org/What-is-a-Promise-Neighborhood. Rohe, William M. 2009. “From Local to Global: One Hundred Years of Neighborhood Planning.” Journal of the American Planning Association 75 (2) Spring: 209–30. Sand, Peggy, and Phillip Bush. 2011. Market Data-Driven Stabilization: A Case Study of Cleveland’s NEO CANDO Data System. Washington, DC: Enterprise Community Partners, Inc.
184 Strengthening Communities with Neighborhood Data Schmitt, B. 1997. Community Organizations and GIS Implementation: From Experience to Theory. Piscataway, NJ: Center for Social and Community Development, Rutgers University. Teixeira, Samantha, and John Wallace. 2013. “Data-Driven Organizing: A Community- University Partnership to Address Vacant and Abandoned Property.” Journal of Community Practice 21: 248–62. Theodos, Brett. 2012. Analysis of Current Population Survey, 1998–2011. Unpublished paper. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Theodos, Brett, Claudia J. Coulton, and Amos Budde. 2014 “Getting to Better-Performing Schools: The Role of Residential Mobility in School Attainment in Low-Income Neighborhoods.” CityScape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research 16 (1): 61–84. Tough, Paul. 2008. Whatever It Takes: Geoffrey Canada’s Quest to Change Harlem and America. New York: Houghton Mifflin. University Center for Social and Urban Research. 2011. Foreclosure in South Pittsburgh’s Hilltop and Effective Responses. Pittsburgh, PA: University Center for Social and Urban Research, University of Pittsburgh. US Department of Education. 2012. Impact in Place: A Progress Report on the Department of Education’s Place-Based Strategy. Washington, DC: US Department of Education. US Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2011a. Choice Neighborhoods: Summer 2011 Update. Washington, DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development. US Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2011b. “Choice Neighborhoods: History and Hope.” In Evidence Matters: Transforming Knowledge into Housing and Community Development Policy. Washington, DC: Office of Policy Development and Research, US Department of Housing and Urban Development. Von Hoffman, Alexander. 2012. “The Past, Present, and Future of Community Development in the United States.” In Investing in What Works for America’s Communities: Essays on People, Places and Purpose, edited by Nancy O. Andrews and David J. Erickson. San Francisco: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and Low-Income Investment Fund. Walker, Christopher. 2002. Community Development Corporations and Their Changing Support Systems. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. April. Walker, Christopher, Sarah Rankin, and Francisca Winston. 2010. New Approaches to Comprehensive Neighborhood Change: Replicating and Adapting LISC’s Building Sustainable Communities Program. Washington, DC: Local Initiatives Support Corporation. Walker, Christopher, Francisca Winston, and Sarah Rankin. 2009. “Assessing Community Development Program Performance: Quantitative Assessment Strategies for the LISC Sustainable Communities Initiative.” Washington, DC: Local Initiatives Support Corporation. White House. 2011. Building Neighborhoods of Opportunity: White House Neighborhood Revitalization Initiative Report. Washington, DC: Neighborhood Revitalization Initiative, White House. July.
Page 1 and 2:
Efforts to address the problems of
Page 3 and 4:
ABOUT THE URBAN INSTITUTE The nonpr
Page 5 and 6:
iv 4 A 5 Using 6 Using 7 Advances C
Page 8 and 9:
Acknowledgments We would like first
Page 10 and 11:
1 Introduction to the Field The Inc
Page 12 and 13:
Introduction to the Field 3 into an
Page 14 and 15:
Introduction to the Field 5 to set
Page 16 and 17:
Introduction to the Field 7 in chap
Page 18 and 19:
Introduction to the Field 9 improve
Page 20:
Introduction to the Field 11 Streng
Page 23 and 24:
14 Strengthening Communities with N
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Table 2.1. (Continued) City/Metro N
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 66 and 67:
ESSAY From Tornadoes to Transit How
Page 68 and 69:
Institutional Context 59 profession
Page 70 and 71:
Institutional Context 61 graphic, h
Page 72 and 73:
Institutional Context 63 department
Page 74 and 75:
Institutional Context 65 This infor
Page 76 and 77:
Institutional Context 67 By identif
Page 78 and 79:
Institutional Context 69 embedded i
Page 80:
Institutional Context 71 8. For mor
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
100 Strengthening Communities with
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142: 132 Strengthening Communities with
Page 144 and 145: 4 A Framework for Indicators and De
Page 146 and 147: A Framework for Indicators and Deci
Page 158 and 159: 5 Using Data for Neighborhood Impro
Page 160 and 161: Using Data for Neighborhood Improve
Page 178 and 179: New Insights on Neighborhood Change
Page 194 and 195: ESSAY Neighborhood Data and Locally
Page 214 and 215: ESSAY Cutting through the Fog Helpi
Page 228 and 229: 6 Using Data for City and Regional
Page 230 and 231: Using Data for City and Regional St
Page 242 and 243:
Using Data for City and Regional St
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
ESSAY Creating and Using Neighborho
Page 260 and 261:
The Regional Equity Atlas Using Dat
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
The Bond Measure Is Approved Using
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
ESSAY A Solvable Problem Hidden in
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
7 Advances in Analytic Methods for
Page 294 and 295:
Advances in Analytic Methods for Ne
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298 and 299:
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
Page 306 and 307:
Page 308 and 309:
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
Page 314 and 315:
Page 316 and 317:
Page 318 and 319:
Page 320 and 321:
Page 322 and 323:
Page 324 and 325:
Page 326 and 327:
ESSAY The Dynamic Neighborhood Taxo
Page 328 and 329:
Page 330 and 331:
Page 332 and 333:
Page 334 and 335:
Page 336 and 337:
Page 338 and 339:
Sample Output Advances in Analytic
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342 and 343:
Page 344 and 345:
Page 346 and 347:
Page 348:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422:
412 About the Authors served as dir
Page 424 and 425:
About the Essayists Riccardo Bodini
Page 426 and 427:
About the Essayists 417 community a
Page 428:
About the Essayists 419 effects of
Page 431 and 432:
422 Index alternative scenarios, fo
Page 433 and 434:
424 Index Center on Urban Poverty a
Page 435 and 436:
426 Index Community Development Blo
Page 437 and 438:
428 Index data (continued) oversigh
Page 439 and 440:
430 Index early warning systems, no
Page 441 and 442:
432 Index funders, data-driven deci
Page 443 and 444:
434 Index homeless students, chroni
Page 445 and 446:
436 Index Koschinsky, Julia, 307, 3
Page 447 and 448:
438 Index Minneapolis Inspections o
Page 449 and 450:
440 Index Neighborhood Early Warnin
Page 451 and 452:
442 Index OnTheMap, 81, 104 open da
Page 453 and 454:
444 Index privacy concerns (continu
Page 455 and 456:
446 Index Sawicki, David, 10n.2 sca
Page 457 and 458:
448 Index strategic investment init
Page 459 and 460:
450 Index Twin Cities (Minnesota) d
show all

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?