03.03.2015 Views

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

284 <strong>Strengthening</strong> <strong>Communities</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>Neighborhood</strong> <strong>Data</strong><br />

cogent analysis of several analytic challenges and some of the cutting<br />

edge methods that are being developed to address them.<br />

Background and Framework<br />

How does research design and analysis fit into the community indicators<br />

and community change agenda? Although much has been accomplished<br />

on the ground <strong>with</strong> sets of indicators displayed in maps and graphs,<br />

deeper and more complex analysis is required to inform policy and to<br />

add to the knowledge base about community development and change.<br />

In particular, more sophisticated analysis tools are needed to assess the<br />

quality of neighborhood measures, uncover relationships among indicators,<br />

describe places along multiple dimensions, and discover patterns of<br />

change across time and space. Moreover, efforts to estimate the effects<br />

of neighborhoods on residents or to evaluate the impact of community<br />

change initiatives pose challenges of causal attribution that need<br />

to be addressed by careful research design and analysis. In addition, the<br />

plethora of geospatial data and growing demand for information on the<br />

dynamics of neighborhood change require greater attention to the precision<br />

of community measurement and spatial processes than may have<br />

previously been assumed.<br />

There is no one discipline or source to turn to for research design and<br />

analysis methods that are potentially useful for community indicators. In<br />

fact, the individuals contributing to this methodology are investigating a<br />

wide variety of topics and come from many backgrounds, including economics,<br />

sociology, epidemiology, geography, public policy, urban affairs,<br />

community psychology, social work, and others. Their studies have in<br />

common the use of data collected on small areas such as neighborhoods<br />

and rigorous attempts to manipulate the data in ways that address important<br />

questions about community context and change. Although not solely<br />

directed at the analysis of community indicators, there are elements of<br />

their techniques that can be used and applied.<br />

Before we describe selected methodological advances, it is necessary<br />

to acknowledge that the choice of analytic tools and approaches must be<br />

guided by the purpose and focus of the neighborhood indicators study<br />

or project. The particular methodological difficulties that face data analysts<br />

are driven, in part, by the research questions they are asking and<br />

the phenomena they are studying. Below we offer two dimensions along

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!