03.03.2015 Views

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Advances in Analytic Methods for <strong>Neighborhood</strong> <strong>Data</strong> 293<br />

methodological advances are the development of indexes of well-being<br />

applicable to small areas and the creation of typologies of places.<br />

There is a long history of efforts to develop indexes that can provide<br />

a comprehensive measure of the overall well-being of the population<br />

(Hagerty et al. 2001; Hagerty and Land 2007; Land 2000). Most of this<br />

work has been at the national level, or has been comparative across nations,<br />

and has focused on quality of life across multiple domains. Much has been<br />

learned over the years about how to formulate multi-indicator indexes,<br />

and many of the principles can be applied to small areas such as neighborhoods.<br />

First, each of the indicators that go into the index should be as<br />

reliable as possible. Second, the indicators must be standardized or put<br />

on a common scale in order to combine them. Third, a decision has to<br />

be made about how to weight the indicators relative to one another. They<br />

can be weighted equally, but this is still a choice and requires justification.<br />

Fourth, it is important to be aware of the degree to which the indicators are<br />

correlated <strong>with</strong> one another and the pattern of the correlations. Depending<br />

on the purpose of the index, the indicators do not necessarily need<br />

to be correlated, but an index that is multidimensional may need to be<br />

decomposed into its subcomponents for additional analysis. Finally, it<br />

is desirable that the index be tested against external criteria to determine<br />

its validity. These criteria would ideally be both objective (e.g., in<br />

predicting trends or events) and subjective (e.g., as compared <strong>with</strong> the<br />

judgment of individuals).<br />

The Child Well-Being Index in England (Bradshaw et al. 2009), which<br />

relies on administrative records data collected for all locales in the nation<br />

and is estimated for small areas <strong>with</strong> populations of approximately 1,500,<br />

is an example of a carefully developed small-area index. Its basic indicators<br />

are rates and proportions. When the rates are deemed unreliable due<br />

to small numbers, shrinkage estimates (see above) are used to reduce<br />

the margin of error (Noble et al. 2006). All indicators are standardized<br />

before being summed into one of several domains. Within domains,<br />

varying weights are applied. In some domains, equal weights are applied<br />

and in others, the weights are generated through factor analysis. The<br />

domains are then summed to form an index that allows all areas to<br />

be ranked.<br />

A challenge for any indexes of well-being is to establish the correct<br />

weights for combining the individual indicators (Noble et al. 2006). When<br />

this is done by factor analysis, the weights come from the overall contribution<br />

of each indicator to the common variance among them. If the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!