03.03.2015 Views

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

334 <strong>Strengthening</strong> <strong>Communities</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>Neighborhood</strong> <strong>Data</strong><br />

Table 7.1.2. North Lawndale, In-Type Comparison<br />

Tract 291800<br />

Type 2-A, Seniors<br />

and Centers<br />

Change in value (RSI, 1990–2006) 33% 100%<br />

Median income $18,560 $17,000<br />

Vacant units 29.2% 19.0%<br />

Social capital 3.72 3.95<br />

Unemployment rate 37.0% 20.9%<br />

Turnover (% moved in past five years) 55.2% 30.8%<br />

Educational attainment: no high school diploma 69.1% 42.6%<br />

Low-Income neighborhoods (as identified by the models developed in the<br />

other phases of the DNT project). An initial comparison (summarized<br />

in table 7.1.2) reveals that this tract is actually trailing its peers on a<br />

few important dimensions, including employment, educational attainment,<br />

and, to a lesser extent, social capital 14 —all of which are drivers of<br />

improvement in place. This information can then be used to prioritize<br />

interventions and address these particular areas.<br />

The typology can also be used to go one step further and find out<br />

how similar neighborhoods have been dealing <strong>with</strong> these issues. In<br />

particular, the typology can be used from the bottom up to find the<br />

neighborhoods that are most similar to a particular place (in the case of<br />

the North Lawndale neighborhood discussed above, several neighborhoods<br />

on the West and South Side of Chicago, as well as some communities<br />

in South Dallas), see which ones have successfully dealt <strong>with</strong> the<br />

same development issues (in this case, unemployment and educational<br />

attainment), and identify the interventions that can best be adapted<br />

and applied. 15<br />

An additional important use for the typology is that it can help analysts<br />

think strategically about the trajectory in which a neighborhood is<br />

headed and what kind of place its residents would like it to be. Consider,<br />

for instance, neighborhoods in type 6 (Coming Attractions). Based on<br />

the dynamics of change identified using the transition matrix, we know<br />

that these areas can evolve in several directions and become very different<br />

types of places. By comparing the characteristics of these different<br />

types, we can identify areas of intervention that would help push the<br />

neighborhood in the desired direction. For instance, if the residents of a<br />

type-6 neighborhood determined that they would like their community

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!