03.03.2015 Views

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Advances in Analytic Methods for <strong>Neighborhood</strong> <strong>Data</strong> 325<br />

the chart is represented in our source analysis by degrees of color, from<br />

dark red (very low) to dark blue (very high). The neighborhood types are<br />

created by grouping neighborhoods that tend to have similar scores on<br />

the same variables, which can be viewed in our report by the concentrations<br />

of red and blue cells on the map. For instance, a blue area on the<br />

bottom left of the map identifies a group of neighborhoods <strong>with</strong> a high<br />

percentage of young adults, high income levels, and a high concentration<br />

of retail, services, and entertainment venues. Similarly, a blue area<br />

at the top of the central section of the map identifies a group of mostly<br />

residential neighborhoods characterized by older residents, high homeownership<br />

rates, and prevalence of single-family homes.<br />

The figure contains two additional important pieces of information.<br />

The first is that neighborhoods that are closer together in the chart are<br />

more similar than neighborhoods that are further apart. These relationships<br />

are summarized in the tree structure on the top of the figure. In<br />

this sense, the typology generated by the DNT project is actually a taxonomy<br />

of neighborhoods: indeed, it works just like a taxonomy of living<br />

organisms in biology, which organizes all forms of life in a hierarchical<br />

structure that goes from the broadest grouping of kingdom to phylum,<br />

then class, and so forth all the way down to species.<br />

This means that the typology can be used from the top down as well<br />

as from the bottom up. In other words, we can start <strong>with</strong> the broadest<br />

possible grouping of neighborhoods and further refine our types as<br />

we move down the tree. Or, we can start <strong>with</strong> a particular neighborhood<br />

and identify which other neighborhoods are most similar to it.<br />

The top-down approach is useful to surface general findings regarding a<br />

particular neighborhood type, such as its likelihood of undergoing particular<br />

changes or the interventions most likely to make a difference.<br />

The bottom-up approach, on the other hand, can be used to see how a<br />

particular neighborhood is doing relative to its peers, or to evaluate the<br />

impact of a specific intervention.<br />

The second piece of information is that the same hierarchical structure<br />

is applied to the variables used to build the typology. Therefore,<br />

variables that are closer together in the figure tend to be correlated to<br />

each other and have similarly high or low values in the same neighborhoods,<br />

revealing how different factors combine to determine neighborhood<br />

types. In particular, the tree to the right of the map shows there<br />

are three main groups of variables. The first group has to do <strong>with</strong> the<br />

stability of the neighborhood and its housing stock, and it includes

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!