03.03.2015 Views

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

50 <strong>Strengthening</strong> <strong>Communities</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>Neighborhood</strong> <strong>Data</strong><br />

Although all people are equal under the eyes of the law, the services<br />

they require from their local government are not. Simply put, equitable<br />

service delivery does not necessarily equate to equal service delivery.<br />

Local governments that analyze data to better understand the socioeconomic<br />

and demographic makeup of their community’s population<br />

can provide better services to all residents. The amenities offered at a<br />

neighborhood park, for example, may vary widely based on the nature<br />

of those living near the facility. If a neighborhood’s population is composed<br />

of empty nesters and few young children, installing playground<br />

equipment would make little sense. Likewise, the establishment of public<br />

transportation routes and schedules needs to consider where people live<br />

and where they work.<br />

<strong>Data</strong>-Driven Performance Programs<br />

Performance management programs and process improvement efforts<br />

have sprung up in communities across the United States, all designed<br />

to provide basic components for data-driven decision making. In 1999,<br />

Baltimore instituted CitiStat, the first local government performance<br />

management program in which city departments and agencies routinely<br />

track metrics to look for substandard performance and propose solutions<br />

if service problems are detected.<br />

Behn (2008) employed the global term PerformanceStat to describe<br />

these types of performance analysis programs, which use data to measure<br />

the performance of local government departments in their delivery<br />

of programs and services and in operational decisions based on<br />

that data. These programs create benchmarks (i.e., the level of service<br />

departments can deliver given the necessary staff and resources under<br />

normal circumstances), review historical trend data, and ask questions:<br />

If the service department isn’t delivering its programs and services at the<br />

expected level, why not? These programs offer a degree of transparency<br />

and accountability that demonstrate public tax dollars are being used<br />

appropriately to deliver the programs and services to citizens. The programs<br />

are driven in large part by the old adage that what gets measured<br />

gets done.<br />

Behn (2008) cautions a PerformanceStat program can easily<br />

become the latest government fad if not implemented <strong>with</strong> integrity<br />

and consistency and defines seven common errors governments make<br />

in attempting to replicate successes achieved by other governments.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!