03.03.2015 Views

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Potential and the Way Forward 403<br />

unitary network structure. There is not enough information available<br />

now to support a specific recommendation on how these supports can<br />

be most effectively delivered at the broader scale we have proposed. The<br />

coalition should consider the design for an effective peer network <strong>with</strong><br />

these capacities once it has reviewed and cataloged existing networks<br />

and resources.<br />

3. Expand access to data from governments and private firms.<br />

This area entails efforts by the coalition to encourage all levels of government<br />

and some private firms to release their existing nonconfidential<br />

datasets to the public in usable formats. In all aspects of this effort, the<br />

coalition should work in partnership <strong>with</strong> the open data movement discussed<br />

in chapter 3 and earlier in this chapter (Pettit et al. 2014).<br />

Without devoting many of its own resources to direct advocacy, the<br />

coalition could make an important contribution in this area simply by<br />

serving as a central scorekeeper, annually documenting and assessing<br />

progress <strong>with</strong> data releases and suggesting priorities for advocacy by<br />

others based on that assessment. The situation differs at different levels:<br />

• Federal government. Chapter 3 notes that the number of national<br />

datasets <strong>with</strong> useful information for local analysis has grown rapidly<br />

in recent years. The federal government has taken explicit positions<br />

favoring these directions [see Orzag (2009) and White House<br />

(2009)], and considerable progress has been made under data.gov.<br />

In addition to promoting new releases, however, there is a need<br />

for advocacy to preserve current national data collection and dissemination<br />

efforts that may be threatened by funding cuts. The<br />

coalition’s national scorekeeping function could be helpful in suggesting<br />

priorities for preservation as well as those for new releases.<br />

• State governments. To date, reviews of open data at the state level<br />

have focused on legislative or budget data; see OpenStates.org as<br />

one example. More information is needed about other data, such<br />

as education, health, housing, and public assistance data. Additional<br />

research could document how the states are making progress opening<br />

up a broad array of data, including data that can be disaggregated<br />

for census tracts, cities, and counties.<br />

• Local governments. One recommendation here is for the coalition<br />

to incorporate education about, and advocacy for, open data as an<br />

integral part of its information campaign to encourage broader

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!