03.03.2015 Views

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

2000115-Strengthening-Communities-with-Neighborhood-Data

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Using <strong>Data</strong> for City and Regional Strategies 255<br />

was becoming available, Metro staff and environmental advocates began<br />

to explore the possibility of expanding on the purchase and protection<br />

of natural areas that was initiated under a $136 million regional greenspaces<br />

bond measure that had been approved by voters in 1995. Although<br />

there had been significant analysis before the first greenspace bond measure<br />

of the locations and allocations of natural assets to be acquired,<br />

no analysis had specifically focused on equity and the distribution of<br />

natural assets or their locations relative to disadvantaged populations.<br />

Coincidentally, as the second greenspaces bond measure discussion<br />

was building, CLF had launched a significant outreach effort to publicize<br />

the soon-to-be published Regional Equity Atlas. As part of this outreach,<br />

the coalition engaged the Environmental Justice Action Group and other<br />

long-time environmental activists in a discussion about how to best use<br />

the new information that the Regional Equity Atlas analyses had generated<br />

around access to parks and natural areas. According to Labbe, it was<br />

a “no-brainer” to apply what he and CLF had learned through the atlas<br />

process to integrate equity into the regional policies that would underlie<br />

the new bond measure.<br />

Before the release of the Regional Equity Atlas, bond measure advocates<br />

had considered including a capital grants program that, unlike the<br />

regional and municipal shares that had made up the 1995 measure and<br />

would remain the backbone of the new bond measure, could accommodate<br />

unanticipated opportunities. In other words, the new bond measure<br />

could include opportunistic purchases that were not specifically identified<br />

as projects at the outset. According to Ron Carley (then CLF board<br />

chair, now executive director of CLF), what further fueled the desire to<br />

create more flexibility in the new bond measure at the neighborhood<br />

level was the discontent that had been registered among some voters<br />

who had supported the first bond measure but hadn’t seen any natural<br />

area acquisition in their neighborhoods. 1 Often, these complaints came<br />

from residents of fully built-out urban neighborhoods where natural<br />

areas were scarce. Findings from the Regional Equity Atlas confirmed<br />

that there were, in fact, park-deficient neighborhoods in the region, and<br />

that these deficiencies were not being addressed by existing greenspace<br />

policies and programs. By focusing on neighborhoods, this capital grants<br />

program component could offer community groups and local planning<br />

agencies the opportunity to begin to remedy these deficiencies.<br />

Noting that “over one-third (36%) of the region’s population inside<br />

the [urban growth boundary] lives farther than a quarter-mile linear

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!