17.04.2015 Views

Summary Report for Conduct of Kozloduy NPP Stress Tests

Summary Report for Conduct of Kozloduy NPP Stress Tests

Summary Report for Conduct of Kozloduy NPP Stress Tests

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

“<strong>Kozloduy</strong> <strong>NPP</strong>” PLC<br />

SUMMARY REPORT<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>Conduct</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kozloduy</strong> <strong>NPP</strong><br />

<strong>Stress</strong> <strong>Tests</strong><br />

elevation <strong>of</strong> flooding, and the pipes are placed in watertight protective channels. Accordingly, there<br />

is no risk <strong>of</strong> flooding safety related SSCs through them. The domestic and rain waters are<br />

discharged directly into drain channel-1 without treatment and the possibility <strong>of</strong> reaching the water<br />

to the buildings is precisely through them.<br />

For the purposes <strong>of</strong> safety margins reassessment a review was per<strong>for</strong>med on two buildings<br />

<strong>of</strong> additional system <strong>for</strong> steam generator emergency makeup. The review is aimed at determining<br />

the risk <strong>of</strong> flooding in sewage network. Level 0,00 <strong>of</strong> additional system <strong>for</strong> steam generator<br />

emergency makeup is established as 35.60. During the review it was confirmed that two buildings<br />

<strong>of</strong> additional system <strong>for</strong> steam generator emergency makeup have siphon at elevation -4,50 = 31,10<br />

m which is discharged into shaft 1591 <strong>of</strong> Unit 3 and shaft 1766 <strong>of</strong> unit 4.<br />

The availability <strong>of</strong> these siphons determined the ability <strong>of</strong> returning <strong>of</strong> rainwater sewage and<br />

as a result, two buildings <strong>of</strong> additional system <strong>for</strong> steam generator emergency makeup can be<br />

flooded if the water elevation exceeds 31.10. The difference between the critical height <strong>of</strong> the<br />

flooding and MWL is -1,83 m, i.e. these buildings are likely to be flooded first through rainwater<br />

sewage. Obviously, the buildings <strong>of</strong> additional system <strong>for</strong> steam generator emergency makeup have<br />

margin <strong>of</strong> external flooding at MWL.<br />

In accordance with [89], only the pumps <strong>of</strong> additional system <strong>for</strong> steam generator<br />

emergency makeup will be affected by flooding <strong>of</strong> the building because they are located at<br />

elevation -3.00 m, which determines that it will be flooded with water level above 32.50 m. The<br />

loss <strong>of</strong> these pumps (1 ÷ 4 CEFWS PUMPS) is relevant only if spent fuel is in the reactor as they<br />

are part <strong>of</strong> an alternative logic <strong>of</strong> the primary circuit cooling through the secondary circuit at loss <strong>of</strong><br />

the design cooling system. ASSGEM pump system (1 ÷ 4 CEFWS PUMPS) is not related to<br />

cooling <strong>of</strong> spent nuclear fuel when it is in the SFP.<br />

Emergency diesel generators <strong>of</strong> additional system <strong>for</strong> steam generator emergency makeup<br />

remain available with their section <strong>for</strong> power supply <strong>of</strong> different systems, including pumps <strong>for</strong> spent<br />

fuel storage pool cooldown.<br />

Obviously, it follows from the flooding <strong>of</strong> building additional system <strong>for</strong> steam generator<br />

emergency makeup that there will be loss <strong>of</strong> the only alternative <strong>for</strong> cooling <strong>of</strong> the spent fuel by<br />

water-water cooling <strong>of</strong> the reactor by the steam generators <strong>for</strong> cases where the fuel is placed in the<br />

reactor under conditions <strong>of</strong> [46], [65], [66] (use <strong>of</strong> emergency cooling logic at failure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

standard logic - using ПР with ultimate heat sink <strong>for</strong> essential components service water supply).<br />

Since MWL does not affect the operation <strong>of</strong> standard logics <strong>for</strong> safety functions assurance, it<br />

can be assumed that the effect <strong>of</strong> flooding <strong>of</strong> the building <strong>of</strong> additional system <strong>for</strong> steam generator<br />

emergency makeup is expressed only in reduction <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> systems capable <strong>of</strong> per<strong>for</strong>ming<br />

the same safety function.<br />

3.4.1.3.2 Units 5 and 6 <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kozloduy</strong> <strong>NPP</strong><br />

119/202

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!